The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TWILIGHT OF IDOLS
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The public intellectual Randolph Bourne (1977Bourne ( [1917]]) launched a scathing attack against Dewey's, accusing the Pragma tist philosopher of hypocrisy.”
From Jane Addams and John Dewey (2022) · cites this paper as Bourne, 1977 [1917]
In the citing paper
“According to Bourne, democratic ends no longer require only democratic means for their realization.”
From Jane Addams and John Dewey (2022) · cites this paper as Bourne, 1977 [1917]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ralston, S. J. (2022) · The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.34 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourne, R.
- Corresponding author
- Randolph Bourne
- Venue
- The Radical Will
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1977-12-31
- Pages
- 336-347
- OpenAlex
- W4254222328
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › German Literature and Culture Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
- Keywords
- idols
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
