Cited by 6Pragmatism in Philosophy and EducationHistorical Education Studies WorldwideWhitehead's Philosophy and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 10 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Jane Addams and John Dewey

Open access
Ralston, Shane J.·2022·The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams

Abstract

In this chapter, the points of intellectual consonance between Jane Addams and John Dewey are explored, specifically their (1) shared belief that philosophy is a method, (2) parallel commitments to philosophical pragmatism, and (3) similar convictions that philosophy should serve to address social problems. Also highlighted are points of divergence in their thinking, particularly their positions on the United States’s entry into World War I and, more generally, the value of social conflict. Finally, the chapter concludes with what the author believes is Addams’s and Dewey’s most significant joint contribution to the contemporary philosophical landscape: a vision of practically engaged pragmatism.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This chapter argues that Jane Addams and John Dewey shared a conception of philosophy as a method, a commitment to pragmatism, and a conviction that philosophy should address social problems, and that their most significant joint contribution is a vision of "publicly engaged pragmatism." It also maps their divergences, chiefly over US entry into World War I and the value of social conflict.

Key findings

  • Addams and Dewey both held that philosophy is a method rather than a device for "the problems of philosophers," but unlike Descartes they saw it as a communal, practical activity; Addams stressed that the most educative situations need not involve "the college type of culture" (Addams, 1910, p. 435), while Dewey remained "an academician at heart."
  • The author credits Addams with catalyzing Dewey's philosophical conversion from Hegelian absolutism to experimental pragmatism, citing Stengel's reading of Dewey's October 1894 letter to his wife ("Addams converted me internally") and Seigfried's claim that Hull House was one of two communities central to Dewey's early pragmatism.
  • Three cases illustrate their shared social-reform ethics: Hull House and the settlement movement, the 1894 Pullman Strike (Addams's "A Modern Lear" compared George Pullman to King Lear; Dewey called it "one of the greatest things I have ever read"), and child labor, where both opposed industrial exploitation of children and Dewey endorsed compulsory public schooling (New York Times, 1913).
  • Their sharpest divergence was WWI: Addams maintained pacifism and was heckled and portrayed as expressing "pro-German twaddle" (Joslin, 2010, p. xix), while Dewey held US entry a "necessary evil" for international democratic ends; Dewey later supported the outlawry of war movement. They also differed on social conflict—Dewey treating it as instrumentally valuable ("conflict is the gadfly of thought," 1922, p. 300), Addams denying that antagonism was necessary to appreciating truth.

Methods

This is a conceptual/historical chapter in an edited handbook, not an empirical study. It proceeds by close reading of Addams's and Dewey's published writings (e.g., "The Subjective Necessity for Social Settlements," 1893; "A Modern Lear," 1912; "The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy," 1917) and their correspondence, alongside secondary scholarship (Stengel, Seigfried, Hamington, Knight, Cochran, Pratt, Rockefeller, McKenna, Leffers). No sample, dataset, or formal analysis is reported.

Limitations

The chapter states no limitations of its own. Evident from the text: the author explicitly declines to adjudicate the contentious question of what caused Dewey's philosophical transformation ("For want of space, I will not wade into the debate," note 8), so the causal claim about Addams's influence rests on cited interpreters rather than new evidence. The author also warns against the "filtering strategy" of reading Addams through Dewey's framework, and notes scholarly disagreement over whether either figure was sufficiently radical in their reform commitments (West, 1989; Hamington, 2009b; Fischer, 2013).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544518.013.34

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

1 of 10 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation
    § The Value of Social Conflict

    Dewey conceived social conflict as instrumentally valuable to inspiring fresh ideas and new paths of inquiry.

    “Dewey conceived social conflict as instrumentally valuable to inspiring fresh ideas and new paths of inquiry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dewey, 1922 source

      The available passages are a table of contents, including “Class conflicts” (p. 75) and “Impulse and Conflict of Habits” (p. 125), but no discussion of those topics. Searches for social conflict inspiring new ideas or inquiry returned no substantive passage, so the claim cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given
    § The Pullman Strike

    Addams chastised Pullman for his overly paternalistic approach to managing the lives of his workers.

    “Addams chastised Pullman for his overly pater nalistic approach to managing the lives of his workers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § Child Welfare

    Dewey supported mandatory public schooling as an alternative to the factory work system, which damaged the health and life prospects of poor children.

    “He supported mandatory public schooling as an alterna tive to the factory work system, which damaged the health and life prospects of poor chil dren.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § Child Welfare

    Dewey opposed the industrial exploitation of children.

    “Dewey likewise opposed the in dustrial exploitation of children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § Child Welfare

    In concert with local government, Addams and the settlement movement established organizations and rules to protect the welfare of children.

    “In concert with local government, Addams and the settlement movement established organizations and rules (e.g., the Children's Bureau and child labor laws) to protect the welfare of children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 18
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning
    § Abstract

    Addams and Dewey were contemporaries, collaborators, and friends.

    “Jane Addams and John Dewey were contemporaries, collaborators, and friends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given
    § The Pullman Strike

    Although Addams was more directly involved in the Pullman Strike than Dewey, both reacted similarly to the 1894 uprising of industrial workers in southern Chicago.

    “Although Addams was more directly involved in the Pullman Strike than Dewey, both re acted similarly to the 1894 uprising of industrial workers in southern Chicago.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning
    § United States Entry into World War I

    Addams, the pacifist, argued against US involvement in World War I and suffered public scorn as a result.

    “Addams, the pacifist, argued against US involvement, and suffered public scorn as a result.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation
    § United States Entry into World War I

    Although Addams and Dewey never publicly debated the issue of American entry into WWI, Dewey suffered at the hands of his critics too.

    “Although Addams and Dewey never publicly debated the issue of American entry into WWI, Dewey suffered at the hands of his critics too.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given
    § The Hull House Settlement

    Hull House was led by Addams and later served by Dewey, who was on its board and gave regular talks to its philosophy club.

    “The settlement in Chicago was, of course, Hull House, led by Addams, and later served by Dewey, who was on its board and gave regular talks to its philosophy club.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Intellectual Entanglement

    While Addams provided the raw data of her experience working with Chicago's vulnerable populations at Hull House, Dewey contributed the tools of analysis, specifically his pragmatist method largely inspired by Addams's example.

    “While Addams provided the raw data-namely, her experience working with Chicago's vulnerable populations at Hull House-Dewey contributed the tools of analysis, specifically his newfound pragma tist method, which was largely inspired by Addams's example.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Stengel (2007) bases her position on two letters

    Addams and Dewey shared commitments to social democracy, economic justice, industrial peace, secular humanism, and philosophical pragmatism.

    “They shared commitments to social democracy, economic justice, industrial peace, secular humanism, and-as we will see in the next sec tion-philosophical pragmatism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Intellectual Entanglement

    At around the turn of the century, Dewey shed his Christian identity and embraced democratic humanism.

    “At around the turn of the century, he shed his Christian identity and embraced democrat ic humanism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Abstract

    Addams's and Dewey's most significant joint contribution to the contemporary philosophical landscape is a vision of practically engaged pragmatism.

    “the chapter con cludes with what the author believes is Addams's and Dewey's most significant joint con tribution to the contemporary philosophical landscape: a vision of practically engaged pragmatism.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “The chapter concludes with an argument that Addams's and Dewey's most significant joint contribution to the contemporary philosophical landscape is a vision of practically engaged pragmatism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Intellectual Entanglement

    It is possible to trace some direct influences from Dewey to Addams, and vice versa.

    “Nevertheless, it is possible to trace some direct influences from Dewey to Addams, and vice versa.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation
    § United States Entry into World War I

    According to Bourne, democratic ends no longer require only democratic means for their realization.

    “According to Bourne, democratic ends no longer require only democratic means for their realization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bourne, 1977 [1917] source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Value of Social Conflict

    Neither Addams nor Dewey endorsed acrimony.

    “Neither Addams nor Dewey endorsed the latter”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § United States Entry into World War I

    Pacifism is perfectly compatible with patriotism.

    “Pacifism is instead per fectly compatible with patriotism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Value of Social Conflict

    For Addams, unity and harmony are the only valuable social states toward which all groups, institutions, and communities should aspire and progress.

    “For her, unity and harmony are the only valuable social states toward which all groups, insti tutions, and communities should aspire and progress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Fellow Pragmatists

    Dewey operationalized Hegelian concepts and objects as instruments and objectives of inquiry, scientized dialectical reasoning, and biologized the absolute into the unity of all experience.

    “In transitioning from absolutism to experimentalism, Dewey operationalized Hegelian concepts and objects as instruments and objectives of inquiry; scientized dialectical reasoning, making it the process of experi mental inquiry; and biologized the absolute into the unity of all experience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Child Welfare

    Addams saw city government and regulation as a vehicle for social justice, a mechanism to reform deplorable child labor practices.

    “Addams saw city government and regulation as a vehicle for social justice, a mechanism to reform these deplorable practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Toward a Vision of Publicly Engaged Pragma tism

    The purpose of publicly engaged pragmatism is not to theorize from an armchair, but to engage actual social problems as a member of a community of inquiry.

    “The purpose of publicly engaged pragmatism is not to theorize from an armchair, but to engage actual social problems as a member of a community of inquiry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Hull House Settlement

    The idea was to integrate Hull House into the wider community rather than isolate it.

    “Rather than isolate Hull House, the idea was to inte grate it into the wider community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Hull House Settlement

    Addams, Dewey, and other Chicago settlement reformers aimed to foster interaction between segregated communities through philanthropic projects aimed at uplifting the poor and marginalized.

    “They aimed to foster interaction between segregated communi ties, especially through philanthropic projects aimed at uplifting the poor and marginal ized.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Child Welfare

    Another way Addams and Dewey demonstrated the caring response was in how they reacted to the exploitation of children.

    “Another way in which Addams and Dewey demonstrated the caring response was in how they reacted to the exploitation of children.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Hull House Settlement

    The purpose of Addams, Dewey, and other Chicago settlement reformers was to disrupt the status quo.

    “The purpose of Addams, Dewey, and other Chicago settlement reformers, then, was to disrupt the status quo.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § United States Entry into World War I

    Later Dewey would realize the error of his ways and support the outlawry of war movement.

    “Later Dewey would realize the error of his ways and support the out lawry of war movement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Notes:

    Dewey wrote Addams a letter to apologize for his disagreeable tone and to admit that she was right in her own way.

    “To his cred it, Dewey wrote Addams a letter to apologize for his disagreeable tone and to admit that she was right in her own way.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Hull House Settlement

    Hull House was the realization of an ideal that emerged from the lived experience of Addams and Dewey.

    “Hull House was the realization of an ideal that emerged from the lived experience of Ad dams and Dewey, two of Chicago's public figures and social reformers devoted to healing a community that had long been divided by social enmity, economic injustice, and indus trial strife.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Value of Social Conflict

    For Dewey, social conflict possesses a functional value insofar as it generates rupture between the ideal and the real-between what ought to be and what is the case.

    “In contrast, for Dewey, social con flict possesses a functional value insofar as it generates rupture between the ideal and the real-between what ought to be and what is the case.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Hull House Settlement

    Only dedicated reform and integration of divided communities could produce genuine social change.

    “In a viciously circular way, the status quo served to justify it self; only dedicated reform and integration of these divided communities could produce genuine social change.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given
    § United States Entry into World War I

    American involvement in World War I was crucial to secure long-lasting global harmony.

    “American involvement was crucial to secure long-lasting global harmony.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation
    § The Pullman Strike

    Slow, lateral change occurs when the enlightened leader brings her followers along with her, rather than forces them to follow her and to trust in her purportedly superior judgment.

    “Slow, lateral change occurs when the enlightened leader brings her followers along with her, rather than forces them to follow her and to trust in her purportedly superior judg ment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Pullman Strike

    Addams tried to mediate the Pullman strike and was rebuffed by Chicago's elites, likely owing to her gender.

    “Addams tried to mediate the strike and, likely owing to her gender, was rebuffed by Chicago's elites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given
    § The Value of Social Conflict

    In the process of inquiry, a felt difficulty, problem, or conflict disturbs an initially unified and harmonious state, initiating a process of problem-solving aimed at resolving the conflict and restoring unity.

    “In the process of inquiry, a felt difficulty, problem, or conflict disturbs an initially unified and harmonious state, initiating a process of problem-solving aimed at resolving the conflict and restoring unity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The Hull House Settlement

    Dewey shared Addams's democratic conviction and devoted his time to advancing the Hull House project.

    “Dewey shared this democratic conviction and devoted his time to advancing the project.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § United States Entry into World War I

    Jane Addams maintained a pacifist stance; democracy as a way of life could not be realized through such means.

    “Jane Addams, in the face of harsh public criticism … maintained a pacifist stance; democracy as a way of life could not be realized through such means.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cochran, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation
    § United States Entry into World War I

    For Dewey, US participation in World War I was needed to defeat Germany and move to public control of transnational interests and world organization; war was a necessary means to international democratic ends.

    “For Dewey, US participation was needed to defeat Germany and move to the impor tant business of public control of transnational interests and world organization; war was a necessary means to international democratic ends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cochran, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Toward a Vision of Publicly Engaged Pragma tism

    The ultimate value of pragmatism as a philosophical method is tested in the crucible of public, practical, and engaged experience.

    “In other words, the ultimate value of pragmatism as a philosophical method is tested in the cru cible of public, practical, and engaged experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
34 of 34

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Addams, Jane. (2002 [1929]). A toast to John Dewey. In C. H. Seigfried (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of John Dewey (pp. 25–30). Penn State University Press.
  2. 1912, A modern Lear., Survey
  3. The college woman and Christianity., The Independent
  4. Addams, Jane. (1893). The subjective necessity for social settlements. In Henry C. Adams (Ed.), Philanthropy and Social Progress (pp. 1–26). Thomas Y. Cromwell.
  5. Dewey, John. (2008 [1939]). Creative democracy—the task before us. In: Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), The Collected Works of John Dewey, Later Works, 1925–1953, vol. 13: 1938–1939 (pp. 226–228). Southern Illinois University Press.
  6. Dewey, John. (2002a [1896]). John Dewey to Alice Chipman Dewey, letter dated January 19. In Larry A. Hickman, Barbara Levine, Anne S. Sharpe, and Harriet Furst Sion (Eds.), The Correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952, vol. 1: 1871–1918 (pp. 112–114). Intelex.
  7. Dewey, John. (2002a [1894]). John Dewey to Alice Chipman Dewey, letter dated October 10. In: Larry A. Hickman, Barbara Levine, Anne S. Sharpe, and Harriet Furst Sion (Eds.), The correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952, vol. 1: 1871–1918 (pp. 114–116). Intelex.
  8. Dewey, John. (2002b [1894]). John Dewey to Alice Chipman Dewey, letter dated July 2. In: Larry A. Hickman, Barbara Levine, Anne S. Sharpe, and Harriet Furst Sion (Eds.), The correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952, vol. 1: 1871–1918 (pp. 120–123). Intelex.
  9. Dewey, John. (1978 [1917]). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In: Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), The collected works of John Dewey, middle works, 1899–1924, vol. 10: 1916–1917 (pp. 3–48). Southern Illinois University Press,
  10. Dewey, John. (1971[1893]). Christianity and democracy. In: Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), The collected works of John Dewey, early works, 1893–1894, vol. 1: 1893–1894 (pp. 5–9). Southern Illinois University Press.
  11. Dewey, John. (1969[1889]). The lessons of contemporary French literature. In Jo Ann Boydston (Ed.), The collected works of John Dewey, early works, 1893–1894, vol. 3: 1889–189 (pp. 36–42). Southern Illinois University Press.
  12. Dewey, John. (1930). From absolutism to experimentalism. In: George P. Adams and Wm. Pepperell Montague (Eds.), Contemporary American philosophy: Personal statements (pp. 13–27). Russell & Russell.
  13. Child labor law has aided schools; Prof. John Dewey of Columbia says much more should be done for young workers; Plea for dull children: They most of all need vocational training; -Praise Henry Street Settlement., New York Times
  14. 1967, Beloved lady: A history of Jane Addams’s ideas on reform and peace
  15. 2013, Reading Dewey’s political philosophy through Addams’s compromises., American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
  16. 2019, John Dewey: Portrait of a progressive thinker., Humanities
  17. 1969, Prolegomena to ethics.
  18. 1910, The phenomenology of mind
  19. Joslin, Katherine. (2010). Introduction. In Jane Addams, Peace and bread in time of war (pp. ix–xxii). University of Illinois Press.
  20. 1997, Biography’s window on social change: Benevolence and justice in Addams’s “A Modern Lear., Journal of Women’s History
  21. 2000, Jane Addams: A biography
  22. 1925, The phantom public
  23. 1922, Public opinion
  24. 2003, The education of John Dewey
  25. McKenna, Erin. (2002). The need for a pragmatist feminist self. In C. H. Seigfried (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of John Dewey (pp. 133–159). Penn State University Press.
  26. 2002, Keeping the conversation going: Jane Addams’s rhetorical strategies in “A Modern Lear., Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  27. 2017, Education, expediency, and democratic dilemmas during war time: Inside the Dewey-Bourne debate., The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
  28. 2005, Deliberative democracy as a matter of public spirit: Reconstructing the Dewey-Lippmann debate., Contemporary Philosophy
  29. 2007, Education and Culture
  30. 2003, The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration., Administration & Society

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ralston, S. J.
Affiliations
Political Science, Richard Wright College, Woolf University
Corresponding author
Ralston, Shane J.
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams
Published
2022-02-14
Pages
169-186
OpenAlex
W4212894523
Cited by
6
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
11.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Historical Education Studies Worldwide
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications
Keywords
Jane Addams, John Dewey, pragmatism, social philosophy, social problems, World War I, social conflict, intellectual history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review