The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR RECURRENT EPIDEMICS
Abstract
Abstract : A quantitative theory of epidemics in any complete sense is still a very long way off. The well-known complexity of most epidemiological phenomena is hardly surprising, for not only does it depend on the interactions between hosts and infecting organisms, each individual interaction itself usually a complicated and fluctuating biological process, but it is also, and this is a further point to be stressed, a struggle between opposing populations, the size of which may play a vital role. This last aspect is essentially one that can only be discussed in terms of statistical concepts. One contrast of my own approach with that of many earlier studies is that complete probabilistic or stochastic formulations have always been in mind. This enables the status of previous deterministic formulations, as approximations valid to some extent in the case of large numbers, to be examined. It will be shown that in some respects, as (i) epidemics always begin with only one or two infected persons, (ii) local units even of a large population are still small, the neglect of the random or chance factor can be quite misleading. I have been interested in particular in possible mechanisms for recurrent epidemics, when the susceptible population is in one way or other replenished. Measles, with children continually growing up into the critical age period, has been the explicit infectious disease usually in mind. The phenomenon of extinction or fade-out of infection largely decides whether the deterministic approximation has any relevance or not to the quasiperiodicity of recurrent epidemics. This chance of extinction, which alters with the characteristics of the model, is high for models appropriate to measles in comparatively small communities. This implies that the two-year cycle sometimes claimed as an inherent feature of measles, and an observed fact for many large urban areas, will be replaced by a longer average interval between epidemics for smaller communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemical basis of morphogenesis
Turing, A. M. (1952) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 · Cited by 11,733
Cited by
RECURRENT OUTBREAKS OF MEASLES, CHICKENPOX AND MUMPS
LONDON, W. P., & YORKE, J. A. (1973) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121575 · Cited by 459
Stochasticity and heterogeneity in host–vector models
Lloyd, A. L., Zhang, J., & Root, A. M. (2007) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1064 · Cited by 113
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
. (2020) · The Management Accountant Journal · doi:10.33516/maj.v55i6.72-72p · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, M. S.
- Venue
- Contributions to Biology and Problems of Health
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1956-12-31
- Pages
- 81-110
- OpenAlex
- W1577476021
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR RECURRENT EPIDEMICS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/9780520350717-007
- The paper
- Bartlett, M. S. (1956). DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC MODELS FOR RECURRENT EPIDEMICS. Contributions to Biology and Problems of Health. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520350717-007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.