The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue
Abstract
How policymakers should guide, manage, and oversee public bureaucracies is a question that lies at the heart of contemporary debates about government and public administration. In their search for better systems of public management, reformers have looked in particular at the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. These countries are exemplars of the New Public Management, a term used to describe distinctive new themes, styles, and patterns of public service management. Calling for public management to become a vibrant field of public policy, this valuable book consolidates recent work on the New Public Management and provides a basis for improving research and policy debate on managing public bureaucracies. A copublication with the Russell Sage Foundation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Dunleavy, P. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057 · Cited by 2,638
What to do when Stakeholders matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques
Bryson, J. M. (2004) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722 · Cited by 1,426
Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector
Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00570.x · Cited by 949
A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004 · Cited by 543
Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform
Moynihan, D. P. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00557.x · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Barzelay, M.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2019-07-24
- OpenAlex
- W1581748125
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/9780520925274
- The paper
- Barzelay, M. (2019). The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. University of California Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520925274
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
