Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organizational goal clarity or members' perception of an organizational goal has a positive effect on innovative behavior.
“Many studies have stated that the clarity of an organizational goal or members' perception of an organizational goal has a positive effect on innovative behavior [34,44,[88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Participation and communication have a positive effect on organizational innovation.
“Several other studies have also found that participation and communication have a positive effect on organizational innovation [16,34,36,[56][57][58][59][62][63][64][65][66][67]106,109,[130][131][132][133].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Participation has a positive effect on innovative behavior.
“There have been many prior studies that have shown that participation has a positive effect on innovative behavior [16,34,58,[106][107][108][109].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Managerial activities can influence DGT.
“However, managerial activities can influence DGT (Fernandez & Rainey, 2006).”
From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Fernandez & Rainey, 2006
The literature on organizational change stresses the role of public managers.
“The literature on organizational change stresses the role of public managers (Fernandez & Rainey, 2006;Tassabehji et al., 2016).”
From Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors (2021) · cites this paper as Fernandez & Rainey, 2006
Cites
Explaining Development and Change in Organizations
van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329 · Cited by 3,762 · see citing works
Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The management of change in public organizations: A literature review
KUIPERS, B. S., HIGGS, M., KICKERT, W., TUMMERS, L., GRANDIA, J., & VAN DER VOET, J. (2014) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12040 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study
Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021) · International Journal of Engineering Business Management · doi:10.1177/18479790211016273 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A literature review and research agenda
Piening, E. P. (2013) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.708358 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Lee, S.-Y., & Whitford, A. B. (2013) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mus050 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042079 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Organizational Change: A Conceptual Framework to Advance the Evidence Base
Packard, T. (2013) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2013.739534 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Examining the Determinants of Police Department Transparency: The View of Police Executives
Chanin, J., & Espinosa, S. (2016) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/0887403415596039 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Al-Emadi, A., & Anouze, A. L. (2018) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/ijegr.2018010102 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rainey, Hal G.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-176
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2121212693
- Cited by
- 949
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 38.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- organizational change, public sector management, change management, public administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
