The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavioral Ecology and the Transition to Agriculture
Abstract
This innovative volume is the first collective effort by archaeologists and ethnographers to use concepts and models from human behavioral ecology to explore one of the most consequential transitions in human history: the origins of agriculture. Carefully balancing theory and detailed empirical study, and drawing from a series of ethnographic and archaeological case studies from eleven locations—including North and South America, Mesoamerica, Europe, the Near East, Africa, and the Pacific—the contributors to this volume examine the transition from hunting and gathering to farming and herding using a broad set of analytical models and concepts. These include diet breadth, central place foraging, ideal free distribution, discounting, risk sensitivity, population ecology, and costly signaling. An introductory chapter both charts the basics of the theory and notes areas of rapid advance in our understanding of how human subsistence systems evolve. Two concluding chapters by senior archaeologists reflect on the potential for human behavioral ecology to explain domestication and the transition from foraging to farming.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Archaeological predictive models often incorporate all known site locations regardless of period, which can lead to spurious results as past land use decisions vary through time.
“Archaeological predictive models often incorporate all known site locations, regardless of period, which can lead to spurious results as past land use decisions vary through time [24].”
From Advancing predictive modeling in archaeology: an evaluation of regression and machine learning methods on the grand staircase-escalante national monument (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boivin, N., & Fuller, D. Q. (2009) · Journal of World Prehistory · doi:10.1007/s10963-009-9018-2 · Cited by 268
Integrating Archaeological Theory and Predictive Modeling: a Live Report from the Scene
Verhagen, P., & Whitley, T. G. (2012) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-011-9102-7 · Cited by 190
The origins of food production in north China: A different kind of agricultural revolution
Bettinger, R. L., Barton, L., & Morgan, C. (2010) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20236 · Cited by 174
Delay Discounting Correlates with Proportional Lateral Frontal Cortex Volumes
Bjork, J. M., Momenan, R., & Hommer, D. W. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.023 · Cited by 134
Yaworsky, P. M., Vernon, K. B., Spangler, J. D., Brewer, S. C., & Codding, B. F. (2020) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239424 · Cited by 104
Fire mosaics and habitat choice in nomadic foragers
Bliege Bird, R., McGuire, C., Bird, D. W., Price, M. H., Zeanah, D., & Nimmo, D. G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921709117 · Cited by 64
The Ideal Distribution Model and Archaeological Settlement Patterning
Weitzel, E. M., & Codding, B. F. (2022) · Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.1080/14614103.2020.1803015 · Cited by 49
Coastal resources and the early holocene las vegas adaptation of Ecuador
Stothert, K. E. (2011) · Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8219-3_15 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2019-07-16
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review