The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups 1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“as patrilineal corporate kin groups generally coexist with female exogamy40”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Such recent common descent may even be retained in cultural memory via oral genealogies, such as among descent groups in Northern and Western Africa, whose members can trace descent relationships up to three to four centuries before the generation currently living40”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Secondly, some patrilineal systems, known as segmentary patrilineal systems, are characterised not only by patrilineal descent but also by the segmentation (also called fission) of descent groups when they become too large10,46.”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.2307/1156403 · DOI
- Bohannan Laura 1951 A Comparative Study of Social Differentiation in Primitive Society.(D.Phil. thesis University of Oxford.)
- Bohannan P. J. 1951 Political and Economic Aspects of Land Tenure and Settlement Patterns among the Tiv of Central Nigeria.(D.Phil. thesis University of Oxford.)
- Dry P. D. L. 1950 The Social Structure of a Hausa Village.(B.Sc. thesis University of Oxford.)*.
- Evans‐Pritchard E. E., 1933, The Nuer: tribe and clan, Sudan Notes and Records
- Evans‐Pritchard E. E., 1948, The Divine Kingship of the Shilluk of the Nilotic Sudan.
- Forde, 1938, Fission and Accretion in the Patrilineal Clans of a Semi‐Bantu Community, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 68
- 10.1525/aa.1939.41.4.02a00020 · DOI
- Forde, 1947, The Anthropological Approach in Social Science, The Advancement of Science
- 10.2307/1156445 · DOI
- Forde, 1951, The Yoruba Speaking Peoples of South‐Western Nigeria, Ethnographic Survey of Africa.
- Fortes M., 1949, Social Structure: studies presented to A. R. Radcliffe‐Brown
- 10.2307/1156164 · DOI
- Gough E. K. 1950 Kinship among the Nayar of the Malabar Coast of India.(D. Phil. thesis University of Cambridge.)*.
- Kroeber A. L., 1938, Basic and Secondary Patterns of Social Structure, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 68
- Mayer P., 1949, The Lineage Principle in Gusii Society
- Mitchell J.Clyde 1950 Social Organisation of the Yao of Southern Nyasaland.(D.Phil. thesis University of Oxford.)*.
- Mitchell, 1951, Seven Tribes of British Central Africa
- Peters E. L. 1951 The Sociology of the Beduin of Cyrenaica.(D.Phil. thesis University of Oxford.)*.
- Radcliffe‐Brown A. R., 1930, Social Organisation of Australian Tribes, Oceania, 1
- Radcliffe‐Brown A. R., 1935, Patrilineal and Matrilineal Succession, Iowa Law Review, 2
- Smith E. W., 1935, Africa: what do we know of it?, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 65
- Spoehr A., 1947, Changing Kinship Systems, Anthropological Series, Chicago Natural History Museum, 33
- 10.1525/aa.1950.52.1.02a00020 · DOI
- Warner W. L. 1937 A Black Civilization.. · DOI
- Weber Max, 1947, The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation
- Wilson Monica, 1951, Nyakyusa Age Villages, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 79
Cited by
Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method
Candea, M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108667609 · Cited by 139
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
Segmentary Lineage Organization and Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa
Moscona, J., Nunn, N., & Robinson, J. A. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta16327 · Cited by 108
Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47618-5 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- FORTES, M.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1953-01-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-41
- ISSN
- 0002-7294
- 1548-1433
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
