CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Archeological Linkages with North and South America at La Victoria, Guatemala1

COE, MICHAEL D.·1960·American Anthropologist
DOI 10.1525/aa.1960.62.3.02a00010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.1960.62.3.02a00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • En algunas zonas de América Central esta decoración de líneas onduladas dentadas parece estar relacionada con culturas de tipo formativo, por ejemplo en la Fase Ocós de Guatemala, el Complejo de Aguas Buenas de Chiriquí, el Complejo de Sarigua de la Bahía de Parita, y en el Complejo de Santa María, también en la región de Parita, donde ya pertenece a una fase más tardía, tal vez ancestral en parte

    “En algunas zonas de América Central esta decoración parece estar relacionada con culturas de tipo formativo, por ejemplo en la Fase Ocós de Guatemala (Coe, 1960, Fig. 9); en el Complejo de Aguas Buenas de Chiriquí (Haberland, 1960, p. 203); en el Complejo de Sarigua de la Bahía de Parita (Willey & Mac Gimsey, 1954, Fig. 29), y en el Complejo de Santa María, también en la región de Parita (Willey &”

    From Investigaciones arqueológicas en la costa pacífica de colombia. I: el sitio de cupica (1961) · cites this paper as Coe, 1960

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Borhegyi S. F., 1959, Pre‐Columbian cultural connections between Mesoamerica and Ecuador, Middle American Research Records, 2
  2. Bushnell G. H. S.1951The archaeology of the Santa Elena Peninsula in south‐west Ecuador. Occasional Papers of the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 1.
  3. Canby J. S., 1951, Possible chronological implications of the long ceramic sequence recovered at Yarumela, Spanish Honduras
  4. Chard C. S., 1950, Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, 1
  5. Childe V. G., 1937, Independence, convergence, and borrowing, in institutions, thought, and art
  6. Coe M. D.1959aLa Victoria an early site on the Pacific coast of Guatemala. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Harvard University.
  7. Coe M. D., 1959, Una investigación arqueológica en la Costa del Pacífico de Guatemala, Antropología e Historia de Guatemala, 11
  8. Collier D.andJ. V.Murra1943Survey and excavations in southern Ecuador. Field Museum of Natural History Anthropological Series 35. · DOI
  9. Drucker P. R. F.Heizer andR. J.Squier1959Excavations at La Venta Tabasco 1955. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 170.
  10. Evans Clifford1955A ceramic study of Virginia archaeology. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 160.
  11. 10.2307/276559 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/276636 · DOI
  13. Ford James A., 1940, Crooks Site: a Marksville period burial mound in the La Salle parish, Louisiana
  14. Greengo R.n.d.Prehistory in the lower Mississippi Valley: the Issaquena phase. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Harvard University.
  15. Griffin J. B.1958The chronological position of the Hopewellian culture in the eastern United States. Anthropological Papers Museum of Anthropology University of Michigan No. 12. · DOI
  16. Groot Gerard, 1951, The prehistory of Japan, 10.7312/groo93992 · DOI
  17. Kroeber A. L.1930Cultural relations between North and South America. 23rd International Congress of Americanists pp.5–22. New York.
  18. Kroeber A. L., 1940, The Maya and their neighbors
  19. Larco Hoyle R., 1945, Los Cupisniques
  20. Lathrap Donald W., 1956, An archaeological classification of culture contact situations, Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, 11, 1
  21. Libby W. F., 1952, Radiocarbon dating
  22. Lothrop S. K., 1940, The Maya and their neighbors
  23. 10.2307/1005783 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/276817 · DOI
  25. Porter M. N., 1958, Tlatilco and the Pre‐Classic cultures of the New World
  26. Reichel‐Dolmatoff G., 1956, Momíl, excavaciones en el Sinú‐Revista, Colombiana de Antropología, 5, 109
  27. Ritchie W. A.1944The pre‐Iroquoian occupations of New York State. Rochester Museum Memoir 1. · DOI
  28. Ritchie W. A., 1955, Recent discoveries suggesting an Early Woodland burial cult in the Northeast
  29. Shetrone H. C., 1930, The mound builders
  30. Strong W. D., 1943, Cross sections of New World prehistory, Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 104
  31. Strong W. D., 1952, Cultural stratigraphy in Virú Valley, northern Peru, 10.7312/stro90798 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/276410 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/1005738 · DOI
  34. United States Navy, Hydrographic Office, 1937, Sailing directions for the west coasts of Mexico and Central America
  35. United States Navy, Hydrographic Office, 1938, Sailing directions for South America
  36. Wauchope R., 1954, Middle American Research Records
  37. Wellhausen E. J., 1957, Races of maize in Central America
  38. Willey Gordon, 1955, New interpretations of aboriginal American culture history
  39. 10.1525/aa.1955.57.3.02a00090 · DOI
  40. Willey Gordon, 1954, Early Ancón and early Supe culture: Chavín horizon sites of the central Peruvian coast, 10.7312/will90914 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
COE, M. D.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1960-06
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
363-393
ISSN
  • 0002-7294
  • 1548-1433
DOI
10.1525/aa.1960.62.3.02a00010
Cited by
24
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 18046 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review