The Neglected Situation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People apprehend meaning in gestures, postures, faces, bodies, movements, physical arrangements and the material environment; in different combinations these constitute contexts and shape how utterances are produced and understood.
“People apprehend meaning in gestures, postures, faces, bodies, movements, physical arrangements and the material environment.In different combinations, all of these constitute contexts, and shape the way in which utterances are produced and understood (Bezemer and Jewitt 2009, Goffman 1964, Goodwin 2000).”
From Language and Superdiversity (2015) · cites this paper as Goffman 1964
Meaning is multi-modal, communicated in much more than language alone.
“This is because meaning is multi-modal, communicated in much more than language alone.”
From Language and Superdiversity (2015) · cites this paper as Goffman 1964
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350 · see citing works
(2015) · Language and Superdiversity · doi:10.4324/9781315730240-8 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
Enabling ‘AI’? The situated production of commensurabilities
Jaton, F., & Sormani, P. (2023) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127231194591 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- GOFFMAN, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- GOFFMAN, ERVING
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1964-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 6_PART2
- Pages
- 133-136
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W1976776285
- Cited by
- 1,063
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
