The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear
Abstract
Across America, middle‐class and upper‐middle‐class gated communities are creating new forms of exclusion and residential segregation, exacerbating social cleavages that already exist (Blakely and Snyder 1997; Higley 1995; Lang and Danielson 1997; Marcuse 1997). While historically secured and gated communities were built in the United States to protect estates and to contain the leisure world of retirees, these urban and suburban developments now target a much broader market, including families with children (Guterson 1992; Lofland 1998). This retreat to secured enclaves with walls, gates, and guards materially and symbolically contradicts American ethos and values, threatens public access to open space, and creates yet another barrier to social interaction, building of social networks, as well as increased tolerance of diverse cultural/ racial/social groups (Davis 1992;Devine 1996;Etzoni 1995; Judd 1995; McKenzie 1994). In this paper, I explore how the discourse of fear of violence and crime and the search for a secure community by those who live in gated communities in the United States legitimates and rationalizes class‐based exclusion strategies and residential segregation. I examine whether residents of cities experiencing increasing cultural diversity are fleeing neighborhoods because they have experienced a "loss of place" and therefore feel unsafe and insecure (Altaian and Low 1992). Some people are responding to this loss by choosing to buy into a defensive space, a walled and guarded community that they can call home, [gated communities, United States, urban fear]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Condition of Postmodernity
Harris, C., & Harvey, D. (1991) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/143544 · Cited by 8,605
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Jacobs, J. (2015) · Readings in Planning Theory · doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch4 · Cited by 8,033
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015) · The Handbook of Discourse Analysis · doi:10.1002/9781118584194.ch22 · Cited by 5,485
City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles
(2008) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/030981680809400115 · Cited by 1,358
Lejins, P. P. (1966) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1286876 · Cited by 772
Smith, J. M., & Sibley, D. (1996) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/215944 · Cited by 713
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2012-0-03280-2 · Cited by 699
Fortcified Enclaves: The New Urban Segregation
Caldeira, T. P. R. (1996) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-8-2-303 · Cited by 532
The Enclave, the Citadel, and the Ghetto: What has Changed in the Post-Fordist U.S. City
Marcuse, P. (1997) · Urban Affairs Review · doi:10.1177/107808749703300206 · Cited by 457
On the plaza: the politics of public space and culture
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1021 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in Southern California
Le Goix, R. (2005) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/026730303042000331808 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Low, S. M.
- Venue
- American Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-58
- ISSN
- 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1433
- OpenAlex
- W2053919327
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 35.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.45
- The paper
- Low, S. M. (2001). The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear. American Anthropologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2001.103.1.45
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.