Cited by 136Death, Funerary Practices, and MourningAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryIndigenous Studies in Latin America

“thus are our bodies, thus was our custom”: mortuary cannibalism in an Amazonian society

CONKLIN, BETH A.·1995·American Ethnologist

Abstract

This article examines the cultural logic of mortuary cannibalism practiced, until the 1960s, by the Wari' (Pakaa Nova) of western Brazil. Wari' practices are inadequately explained by the materialist, psychogenic, and symbolic interpretations prominent in recent cannibalism theories. This analysis emphasizes indigenous understandings of the relation of cannibalism to experiences of mourning. Concepts of the human body's social significance made its destruction important to the working out of grief and the attenuation of memories of the dead. In a social process of mourning concerned with transforming mourners' images of the dead, cannibalism appeared as a key element that affirmed ideas of human‐animal regeneration and reciprocity expressed in Wari' myth, cosmology, and eschatology. [cannibalism, body concepts, ritual, death and mourning, Amazonian Indians]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/ae.1995.22.1.02a00040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unpalatable and forced eating of human bodies for symbolic reasons has been ethnographically reported in several contexts.

    “On the contrary, the opposite scenario, the unpalatable and forced eating of human bodies for symbolic reasons, has been ethnographically reported in several contexts (Albert, 1985;Brown & Tuzin, 1983;Conklin, 1995;Goldman, 1999;Sanday, 1986;Vilaça, 1992).”
  • For both Fijian and Amazonian groups, the act of eating human tissues of dead bodies by members of the same group is their expression of funerary practices.

    “Both for the Fijian and Amazonian groups, however, the act of eating human tissues of dead bodies by members of the same group is their expression of funerary practices (in the Wari's words '"Je kwerexi" [Thus was our custom]'; Conklin, 1995;2001, p. xviii).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 136

Authors
CONKLIN, B. A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
CONKLIN, BETH A.
Venue
American Ethnologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
75-101
ISSN
  • 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1425
OpenAlex
W2019512031
Cited by
136
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
22.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Ethnologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
Keywords
mourning, grief, human body, memory of the dead, reciprocity, myth, cosmology, eschatology, ritual, Amazonian indigenous peoples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review