“thus are our bodies, thus was our custom”: mortuary cannibalism in an Amazonian society
Abstract
This article examines the cultural logic of mortuary cannibalism practiced, until the 1960s, by the Wari' (Pakaa Nova) of western Brazil. Wari' practices are inadequately explained by the materialist, psychogenic, and symbolic interpretations prominent in recent cannibalism theories. This analysis emphasizes indigenous understandings of the relation of cannibalism to experiences of mourning. Concepts of the human body's social significance made its destruction important to the working out of grief and the attenuation of memories of the dead. In a social process of mourning concerned with transforming mourners' images of the dead, cannibalism appeared as a key element that affirmed ideas of human‐animal regeneration and reciprocity expressed in Wari' myth, cosmology, and eschatology. [cannibalism, body concepts, ritual, death and mourning, Amazonian Indians]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The unpalatable and forced eating of human bodies for symbolic reasons has been ethnographically reported in several contexts.
“On the contrary, the opposite scenario, the unpalatable and forced eating of human bodies for symbolic reasons, has been ethnographically reported in several contexts (Albert, 1985;Brown & Tuzin, 1983;Conklin, 1995;Goldman, 1999;Sanday, 1986;Vilaça, 1992).”
From The Archaeology of Cannibalism: a Review of the Taphonomic Traits Associated with Survival and Ritualistic Cannibalism (2025) · cites this paper as Conklin, 1995
For both Fijian and Amazonian groups, the act of eating human tissues of dead bodies by members of the same group is their expression of funerary practices.
“Both for the Fijian and Amazonian groups, however, the act of eating human tissues of dead bodies by members of the same group is their expression of funerary practices (in the Wari's words '"Je kwerexi" [Thus was our custom]'; Conklin, 1995;2001, p. xviii).”
From The Archaeology of Cannibalism: a Review of the Taphonomic Traits Associated with Survival and Ritualistic Cannibalism (2025) · cites this paper as Conklin, 1995
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- CONKLIN, B. A.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- CONKLIN, BETH A.
- ORCID
- CONKLIN, BETH A.
- Venue
- American Ethnologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-101
- ISSN
- 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1425
- OpenAlex
- W2019512031
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Ethnologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
- Keywords
- mourning, grief, human body, memory of the dead, reciprocity, myth, cosmology, eschatology, ritual, Amazonian indigenous peoples
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review