The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state
Abstract
In this article I attempt to do an ethnography of the state by examining the discourses of corruption in contemporary India. I focus on the practices of lower levels of the bureaucracy in a small north Indian town as well as on representations of the state in the mass media. Research on translocal institutions such as “the state” enables us to reflect on the limitations of participant‐observation as a technique of fieldwork. The analysis leads me to question Eurocentric distinctions between state and civil society and offers a critique of the conceptualization of “the state” as a monolithic and unitary entity. [the state, public culture, fieldwork, discourse, corruption, India]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
Skocpol, T. (1979) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815805 · Cited by 5,408 · cited 1×
“…state.4 Research on the state, with its focus on large-scale structures, epochal events, major policies, and "important" people (Evans et al. 1985; Skocpol 1979), has failed to illuminate the quotidian practices (Bourdieu 1977) of bureaucrats that tell us about the effects of the state on the…”
BackgroundNotes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977)
ABRAMS, P. (1988) · Journal of Historical Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x · Cited by 2,463
Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Hall, S. (1986) · Journal of Communication Inquiry · doi:10.1177/019685998601000202 · Cited by 1,617
Klitgaard, R. (2019) · doi:10.1525/9780520911185 · Cited by 1,423
Cited by
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization: Close Encounters of the Deceptive Kind
Trouillot, M. (2001) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/318437 · Cited by 749
City of Strangers : Gulf Migration and the Indian Community in Bahrain
Gardner, A. M. (2010) · doi:10.26530/oapen_627411 · Cited by 221
Heyman, J. M. (1998) · Critique of Anthropology · doi:10.1177/0308275x9801800203 · Cited by 175
Religious Politics in Turkey: From the Birth of the Republic to the AKP
Lord, C. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108638906 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- GUPTA, A.
- Venue
- American Ethnologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 375-402
- ISSN
- 0094-0496 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-1425
- OpenAlex
- W1976427270
- Cited by
- 2,521
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 69.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090
- The paper
- GUPTA, A. (1995). blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1995.22.2.02a00090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
