Cited by 2,355Land Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentProperty Rights and Legal Doctrine

A Theory of Access*

Ribot, Jesse C., Peluso, Nancy Lee·2003·Rural Sociology

Abstract

The term “access” is frequently used by property and natural resource analysts without adequate definition. In this paper we develop a concept of access and examine a broad set of factors that differentiate access from property. We define access as “the ability to derive benefits from things,” broadening from property's classical definition as “the right to benefit from things.” Access, following this definition, is more akin to “a bundle of powers” than to property's notion of a “bundle of rights.” This formulation includes a wider range of social relationships that constrain or enable benefits from resource use than property relations alone. Using this framing, we suggest a method of access analysis for identifying the constellations of means, relations, and processes that enable various actors to derive benefits from resources. Our intent is to enable scholars, planners, and policy makers to empirically “map” dynamic processes and relationships of access.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L.
Affiliations
World Resources Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ribot, Jesse C.
  • Peluso, Nancy Lee
Venue
Rural Sociology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
153-181
ISSN
  • 0036-0112 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-0831
OpenAlex
W2160065655
Cited by
2,355
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 220 · 2025: 142 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 124 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 157 · 2019: 182 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 139 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 85
FWCI
39.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rural Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Law › Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
Keywords
access, property, natural resources, bundle of rights, resource utilization (natural resources), access analysis, interpersonal relationships, resource rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review