Cited by 260Indigenous Studies and EcologyEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and BeyondIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

Linking Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge of Climate Change

Alexander, Clarence, Bynum, Nora, Johnson, Elizabeth, King, Ursula, Mustonen, Tero, Neofotis, Peter, Oettlé, Noel, Rosenzweig, Cynthia +5 more·2011·BioScience

Abstract

We explore the connections among indigenous climate-related narratives, documented temperature changes, and climate change impact studies from the scientific literature. We then propose a framework for enhancing synthesis of these indigenous narratives of observed climate change with global assessments. Our aim is to contribute to the thoughtful and respectful integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific data and analysis, so that this rich body of knowledge can inform science and so that indigenous peoples can use the tools and methods of science for the benefit of their communities if they choose to do so. Improving ways of understanding such connections is critical as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report process proceeds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/bio.2011.61.6.10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Today, IPLCs have diverse ecological knowledge about Amazonian plants, animals and landscapes, which allows them to quickly identify and respond to environmental changes with mitigation and adaptation practices.

    “Today, IPLCs have diverse ecological knowledge about Amazonian plants, animals and landscapes, which allows them to quickly identify and respond to environmental changes with mitigation and adaptation practices68,69.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, C., Bynum, N., Johnson, E., King, U., Mustonen, T., Neofotis, P., Oettlé, N., Rosenzweig, C., Sakakibara, C., Shadrin, V., Vicarelli, M., Waterhouse, J., & Weeks, B.
Venue
BioScience
Published
2011-06
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
477-484
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W2142507274
Cited by
260
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0821938)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Christensen Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
indigenous knowledge, climate change, temperature change, climate change impacts, IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, traditional ecological knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review