Cited by 125Diverse Historical and Scientific StudiesEcocriticism and Environmental LiteratureHistorical and Environmental Studies

Climate and history: a critical review of historical climatology and climate change historiography

Carey, Mark·2012·WIREs Climate Change

Abstract

This paper provides a critical analysis of recent climate history (or historical climatology) scholarship. It identifies four key subfields in this historiography of climate change. First, it examines scholarship on climate reconstructions that use a variety of innovative historical sources to document past climatic conditions. Second, it analyzes scholarship on social impacts and responses to climate change. This literature is prolific with significant attention given to climatic variability and climatic or weather‐related disasters. Third, the paper discusses research on the uses and abuses of climate knowledge, such as innovations in meteorology and climatology as well as ways that Western climate knowledge helped justify colonialism and perpetuate racism. Fourth, the paper examines research on cultural constructions and perceptions of climate. This includes analysis of diverse climatic understandings and climate narratives that have varied across time and space. While the climate historiography is steadily expanding and constantly probing new areas, this paper contends that the field overall would benefit from a stronger emphasis on social history to examine race, class, and gender in climate history while also focusing on how social relations and power dynamics affect human–climate interactions. Additionally, it argues that the uncovering of more diverse climate meanings and narratives, partly through better social history, could both enrich the historiography and contribute to today's broader discussions about global climate change in the past and future. WIREs Clim Change 2012 doi: 10.1002/wcc.171 This article is categorized under: Climate, History, Society, Culture > Disciplinary Perspectives

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcc.171

Cites

165 of 165 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carey, M.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Carey, Mark
Venue
WIREs Climate Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-26
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
233-249
ISSN
  • 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-7799
OpenAlex
W1784727984
Cited by
125
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
51.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and Environmental Studies
Keywords
climate history, historical climatology, climate reconstruction, social impacts of climate change, meteorological disasters, racism, climate change narratives, human-climate interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review