The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Navigating a Critical Juncture for Sustainable Weed Management
Abstract
Agricultural weed management has become entrenched in a single tactic—herbicide-resistant crops—and needs greater emphasis on integrated practices that are sustainable over the long term. In response to the outbreak of glyphosate-resistant weeds, the seed and agrichemical industries are developing crops that are genetically modified to have combined resistance to glyphosate and synthetic auxin herbicides. This technology will allow these herbicides to be used over vastly expanded areas and will likely create three interrelated challenges for sustainable weed management. First, crops with stacked herbicide resistance are likely to increase the severity of resistant weeds. Second, these crops will facilitate a significant increase in herbicide use, with potential negative consequences for environmental quality. Finally, the short-term fix provided by the new traits will encourage continued neglect of public research and extension in integrated weed management. Here, we discuss the risks to sustainable agriculture from the new resistant crops and present alternatives for research and policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally
Benbrook, C. M. (2016) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0 · Cited by 1,890
“In response, farmers increased both the rate of glyphosate application as well as the number of applications [5, 6, 9, 88, 13].”
BackgroundAgriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification
Hunter, M. C., Smith, R. G., Schipanski, M. E., Atwood, L. W., & Mortensen, D. A. (2017) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/bix010 · Cited by 1,004
Self-citationA framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems
Schipanski, M. E., Barbercheck, M., Douglas, M. R., Finney, D. M., Haider, K., Kaye, J. P., Kemanian, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., Ryan, M. R., Tooker, J., et al. (2014) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.004 · Cited by 652
Regenerative Agriculture: An agronomic perspective
Giller, K. E., Hijbeek, R., Andersson, J. A., & Sumberg, J. (2021) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/0030727021998063 · Cited by 605
Potential impact of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on human and ecosystems
Islam, F., Wang, J., Farooq, M. A., Khan, M. S. S., Xu, L., Zhu, J., Zhao, M., Muños, S., Li, Q. X., & Zhou, W. (2018) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.020 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortensen, D. A., Egan, J. F., Maxwell, B. D., Ryan, M. R., & Smith, R. G.
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-84
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2163624511
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Navigating a Critical Juncture for Sustainable Weed Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.12
- The paper
- Mortensen, D. A., Egan, J. F., Maxwell, B. D., Ryan, M. R., & Smith, R. G. (2012). Navigating a Critical Juncture for Sustainable Weed Management. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
