Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Brazilian Floristic List Highlights Conservation Challenges

Open access
Forzza, Rafaela C., Baumgratz, José Fernando A., Bicudo, Carlos Eduardo M., Canhos, Dora A. L., Carvalho, Anibal A., Coelho, Marcus A. Nadruz, Costa, Andrea F., Costa, Denise P., Hopkins, Michael G., Leitman, Paula M., Lohmann, Lucia G., Lughadha, Eimear Nic, Maia, Leonor Costa, Martinelli, Gustavo, Menezes, Mariângela, Morim, Marli Pires, Peixoto, Ariane Luna, Pirani, José R., Prado, Jefferson, Queiroz, Luciano P., Souza, Sidnei, Souza, Vinicius Castro, Stehmann, João R., Sylvestre, Lana S., Walter, Bruno M. T., Zappi, Daniela C.·2012·BioScience
DOI 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A comprehensive new inventory of Brazilian plants and fungi was published just in time to meet a 2010 Convention on Biological Diversity target and offers important insights into this biodiversity's global significance.Brazil is the home to the world's richest flora (40,989 species; 18,932 endemic) and includes two of the hottest hotspots: Mata Atlântica (19,355 species) and Cerrado (12,669 species).Although the total number of known species is one-third lower than previous estimates, the absolute number of endemic vascular plant species is higher than was previously estimated, and the proportion of endemism (56%) is the highest in the Neotropics.This compilation serves not merely to quantify the scale of the challenge faced in conserving Brazil's unique flora but also serves as a key resource to direct action and monitor progress.Similar efforts by other megadiverse countries are urgently required if the 2020 targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation are to be attained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Forzza, R. C., Baumgratz, J. F. A., Bicudo, C. E. M., Canhos, D. A. L., Carvalho, A. A., Coelho, M. A. N., Costa, A. F., Costa, D. P., Hopkins, M. G., Leitman, P. M., Lohmann, L. G., Lughadha, E. N., Maia, L. C., Martinelli, G., Menezes, M., Morim, M. P., Peixoto, A. L., Pirani, J. R., Prado, J., Queiroz, L. P., Souza, S., Souza, V. C., Stehmann, J. R., Sylvestre, L. S., Walter, B. M. T., & Zappi, D. C.
Venue
BioScience
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2012-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
39-45
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
DOI
10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.8
OpenAlex
W2160466183
Cited by
389
References
13
FWCI
19.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Brazilian Floristic List Highlights Conservation Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.8
The paper
Forzza, R. C., Baumgratz, J. F. A., Bicudo, C. E. M., Canhos, D. A. L., Carvalho, A. A., Coelho, M. A. N., Costa, A. F., Costa, D. P., Hopkins, M. G., Leitman, P. M., Lohmann, L. G., Lughadha, E. N., Maia, L. C., Martinelli, G., Menezes, M., Morim, M. P., Peixoto, A. L., Pirani, J. R., Prado, J., . . . Zappi, D. C. (2012). New Brazilian Floristic List Highlights Conservation Challenges. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.