The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Sound of Two Hands Clapping: The Education of a Tibetan Buddhist Monk
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“I have argued that debate is an essential part of the scholastic training, particularly in the Geluk tradition whose practices I examine here.”
From What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor (2008) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor
Dreyfus, G. B. (2008) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-007-9079-2 · Cited by 15
Self-citationDebatable Truths: What Buddhist Argumentation Reveals about Critical Thinking
Lugli, L. (2015) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2015.1026150 · Cited by 6
INTERTEXTUALITY AND MEMORY IN EARLY CHINESE WRITINGS: A CASE STUDY FROM HUAINANZI
Weingarten, O. (2019) · Early China · doi:10.1017/eac.2019.4 · Cited by 4
Borchert, T. (2020) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2020.1865011
Metadata
- Authors
- B.J. Dreyfus, G.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2003-01-28
- OpenAlex
- W4241656207
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Sound Studies and Aurality
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
