The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Abstract
Dynamic capabilities have been proposed as a useful way to understand how organizations are able to adapt to changes in technology and markets. Organizational ambidexterity the ability of senior managers to seize opportunities through the orchestration and integration of existing assets to overcome inertia and path dependence, is a core dynamic capability. While promising, research on dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity has not yet been able to specify the specific mechanisms through which senior managers are actually able to reallocate resources and reconfigure assets to simultaneously explore and exploit. Using interviews and qualitative case studies from thirteen organizations, this article explores the actions senior managers took to implement ambidextrous designs and identify which ones helped or hindered them in their attempts. A set of interrelated choices of organization design and senior team process determine which attempts to build ambidextrous organizations are successful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 · Cited by 2,580
Self-citationUnderstanding social media effects across seller, retailer, and consumer interactions
Rapp, A., Beitelspacher, L. S., Grewal, D., & Hughes, D. E. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0326-9 · Cited by 624
The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem
Ansari, S. (., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2442 · Cited by 556
Dynamic Balancing of Exploration and Exploitation: The Contingent Benefits of Ambidexterity
Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1189 · Cited by 406
Füller, J., Hutter, K., Wahl, J., Bilgram, V., & Tekic, Z. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121598 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 5-22
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2059904123
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 82.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
- The paper
- O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.