Cited by 111Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmployee Performance and ManagementCorporate Management and Leadership

Balanced Workplace Flexibility: Avoiding the Traps

Kossek, Ellen Ernst, Thompson, Rebecca J., Lautsch, Brenda A.·2015·California Management Review

Abstract

This article identifies three types of traps that can emerge when implementing workplace flexibility—altered work-life dynamics, reduced fairness perceptions, and weakened organizational culture—and provides core lessons for managers seeking a balanced flexibility approach. First managers must become flex savvy to understand the variation that exists in flexibility practices to align implementation with the workforce and organizational context. Second, implementing flexibility must not be treated as an accommodation but as a broader systemic organizational change empowering individuals and teams. The article provides a Work-smart case to highlight how to avoid traps and implement balanced workplace flexibility across multiple stakeholder interests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Baltimore (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
California Management Review
Published
2015-08
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
5-25
ISSN
  • 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-8564
OpenAlex
W2193356728
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
FWCI
17.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
California Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
Keywords
work flexibility, work-life balance, perceived fairness, organizational culture, organizational change, employee empowerment, stakeholder interests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review