Cited by 347Technostress in Professional SettingsWork-Family Balance ChallengesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction

Suh, Ayoung, Lee, Jumin·2017·Internet Research

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop and test a theoretical model that predicts a teleworker’s job satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach: By drawing on the technostress model and job characteristics theory, this study proposed a theoretical model. The proposed model was tested through a survey of 258 teleworkers from two global IT companies that have adopted telework programs. Findings: The results show that technology and job characteristics jointly induce teleworkers’ technostress, which in turn reduces their job satisfaction. The results also indicate that the manner in which technology and job characteristics influence teleworkers’ technostress varies depending on the intensity of teleworking (IOT). Interestingly, this study finds that teleworkers with a low IOT are more vulnerable to technostress than those with a high IOT. Research limitations/implications: By discussing the magnitude of the different factors that determine teleworkers’ technostress and job satisfaction, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of teleworkers’ challenges. The study provides insights and prescriptive guidelines that will help managers and companies develop strategies to maximize the benefits of teleworking implementation. Practical implications: This study provides insights and prescriptive guidelines for managers or companies to develop strategies to maximize the benefits of teleworking implementation. Originality/value: This paper is one of the first to develop and empirically test an integrated model of technostress and job characteristics. The paper outlines relevant research avenues for researchers investigating remote work and virtual collaboration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/intr-06-2015-0181

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technostress can negatively affect job satisfaction.

    “and job satisfaction (Ragu-Nathan et al. 2008;Suh and Lee 2017) can be negatively affected by technostress.”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Suh and Lee 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suh, A., & Lee, J.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Kyung Hee Cyber University (KR)
Venue
Internet Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
140-159
ISSN
1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579580183
Cited by
347
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Internet Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
remote work, technostress, job satisfaction, job characteristics model, remote collaboration, IT companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review