Metaphoric Gestures Facilitate Perception of Intonation More than Length in Auditory Judgments of Non-Native Phonemic Contrasts
Open accessAbstract
It is well established that hand gestures affect comprehension and learning of semantic aspects of a foreign language (FL). However, much less is known about the role of hand gestures in lower-level language processes, such as perception of phonemes. To address this gap, we explored the role that metaphoric gestures play in perceiving FL speech sounds that varied on two dimensions: length and intonation. English speaking adults listened to Japanese length contrasts and sentence-final intonational distinctions in the context of congruent, incongruent and no gestures. For intonational contrasts, identification was more accurate for congruent gestures and less accurate for incongruent gestures relative to the baseline no gesture condition. However, for the length contrasts, there was no such clear and consistent pattern, and in fact, congruent gestures made speech processing more effortful. We conclude that metaphoric gestures help with some—but not all—novel speech sounds in a FL, suggesting that gesture and speech are phonemically integrated to differing extents depending on the nature of the gesture and/or speech sound.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding gesture does not automatically improve learning outcomes.
“At the same time, research also shows that adding gesture does not automatically improve learning outcomes [18–22] leading researchers to call for more specific predictions about which gestures support learning and when these gestures will be helpful [23–25].”
From Can grammatical morphemes be taught? Evidence of gestures influencing second language procedural learning in middle childhood (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907309 · Cited by 2,583 · see citing works
Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception
Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S. (1985) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03207136 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children
Tellier, M. (2008) · Gesture · doi:10.1075/gest.8.2.06tel · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Janzen Ulbricht, N. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280543 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kelly, S., Bailey, A., & Hirata, Y.
- Affiliations
- Colgate University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Collabra: Psychology
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2474-7394 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2595363726
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Collabra Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Collabra Psychology (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- gesture-speech integration, intonation perception, Japanese as a second language, speech perception, phonemic contrasts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review