Cited by 18Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorLanguage and cultural evolutionAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Cultural Evolution and Long-Term Song Stability in a Dialect Population of Brown-Headed Cowbirds

O'Loghlen, Adrian L., Ellis, Vincenzo, Zaratzian, Devin R., Merrill, Loren, Rothstein, Stephen I.·2011·The Condor

Abstract

Knowing the extent to which the acoustic structure of songs is temporally stable is essential to understanding how cultural evolution affects song dialects in oscines. The acoustic structure of the most prevalent variant of the flight-whistle song recorded from male Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) in the Mammoth dialect (Mammoth Lakes, California) from 2005 to 2009 differed significantly and consistently from whistles recorded in 1989 and 1978–1985. The most common whistle variant in the 2005–2009 sample had structural features absent from whistles described in the earlier studies and overall was produced at a consistently lower acoustic frequency. Besides the emergence of this new variant sometime between 1989 and 2005, the prevalence of other variants of the whistle also changed from 1978 to 2009. Changes reported in other studies of cultural evolution in oscines have been based on lower-level structural elements (notes and syllables), whereas we found that entire songs appear to have evolved as cultural units or memes. We discuss possible mechanisms as to how these changes may have occurred. Despite these changes, the Mammoth whistle still retained the same basic three-syllable structure it had 31 years ago. This stability is notable because of the potential for extreme variation in whistle structure exemplified by the distinct whistles of nearby dialects in the region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/cond.2011.100103

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Loghlen, A. L., Ellis, V., Zaratzian, D. R., Merrill, L., & Rothstein, S. I.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
The Condor
Published
2011-05
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
449-461
ISSN
  • 0010-5422 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5129
OpenAlex
W2075517458
Cited by
18
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ornithological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Molothrus ater, song dialects, cultural evolution, acoustic structure, oscine birds, song variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review