Cited by 75Ethics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in Clinical ResearchQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Form‐Made Persons: Consent Forms as Consent's Blind Spot

Jacob, Marie‐Andrée·2007·PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review

Abstract

In this paper, I take seriously informed consent's material form: the paper form. I pursue two objectives: I first tackle different meanings that have been attributed to the fabrication of document forms themselves, and demonstrate how this fabrication process forces us to rethink the category of consent and, further, that of personhood. Second, I examine the consenting person as a new ethnographic subject and show how her submission to consent forms, in the context of hospital bureaucracies, enacts new forms of agency. Given the fact that patients and research subjects generally do not read consent documents, I conclude by offering the illegible consent form, rather than the meticulously designed consent form, as the exemplary artifact of hospital bureaucracies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.249

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Ben‐Ari Eyal, 1994, Caretaking with Pen? Documentation, Classification, and “Normal” Development in a Japanese Day Care Center, International Review of Modern Sociology, 24, 31
  2. Ben‐Shachar Omri, 2006, Foreword. Michigan Law Review, Boilerplate”: Foundations of Market Contracts Symposium, 104, 821
  3. Boardman Michelle, 2006, Contra Proferentem: The Allure of Ambiguous Boilerplate. Michigan Law Review, Boilerplate”: Foundations of Market Contracts Symposium, 104, 1105
  4. Bowker Geoffrey C., 1999, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, 10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brenneis Donald, 2006, Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, 41
  6. Conso Daniéle, 1990, Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Thing, 40
  7. 10.1086/204343 · DOI
  8. Derrida Jacques, 1995, Mal d'Archive
  9. Faden Ruth, 1994, Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 148
  10. Garfinkel Harold, 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology, 186
  11. Giri Ananta, 2000, Audit Culture, Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, 173
  12. 10.1017/CBO9780511621598 · DOI
  13. Handelman Don, 2004, Nationalism and the Israeli State: Bureaucratic Logic in Public Events
  14. Hertzfeld Michael, 1992, The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy
  15. Hogle Linda F., 2003, Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences, 61
  16. 10.1525/pol.2003.26.2.182 · DOI
  17. Kinross Robin, 1989, Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism, 131
  18. 10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.482 · DOI
  19. Lynch Michael, 1996, The Spectacle of History. Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran‐Contra Hearings
  20. Lynch Michael, Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting
  21. Lynch Michael, 2005, Chains of Custody: Visualization, Representation, and Accountability in the Processing of DNA Evidence, Communication and Cognition, 38, 297
  22. Macklin Ruth, 1999, Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine, 10.1093/oso/9780195116328.001.0001 · DOI
  23. Michigan Law Review Symposium, 2006, Boilerplate”: Foundations of Market Contracts, 104
  24. 10.1515/9781503624429 · DOI
  25. 10.7202/043480ar · DOI
  26. Normand Sylvio2000L'imprimé juridique au Québec du IVIIIe siécle à 1840. History of the Book in Canada Conferences vol. 1. Electronic document http://www.hbic.library.utoronto.ca/vol1normand_fr.htm accessed March 7 2006.
  27. 10.1111/1468-2230.00177 · DOI
  28. Pottage Alain, 2004, Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things, 1, 10.1017/CBO9780511493751 · DOI
  29. Radin Margaret J., 2006, Boilerplate Today: The Rise of Modularity and the Waning of Consent. Michigan Law Review, Boilerplate”: Foundations of Market Contracts Symposium, 104, 1223
  30. Raffel Stanley, 1979, Matters of Fact: A Sociological Inquiry
  31. Rakoff Todd A., 2006, The Law and Sociology of Boilerplate. Michigan Law Review, Boilerplate”: Foundations of Market Contracts Symposium, 104, 1235
  32. Reed Adam, 2006, Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, 158
  33. Riles Annelise, 2001, The Network Inside Out
  34. 10.3998/mpub.185485 · DOI
  35. Rozovsky Lorne, 1997, The Canadian Law of Consent to Treatment
  36. Sanders Mark S., 1993, Human Factors in Engineering and Design
  37. 10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.229 · DOI
  38. Strathern Marilyn, 2006, Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, 181
  39. 10.1017/CBO9780511493751.002 · DOI
  40. 10.1525/lal.2002.14.1.85 · DOI
  41. Warner Michael, 2004, Polemic: Critical or Uncritical?, 13
  42. Watson Alan, 1993, Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 75

Metadata

Authors
Jacob, M.
Corresponding author
Jacob, Marie‐Andrée
Venue
PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
249-268
ISSN
  • 1081-6976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-2934
OpenAlex
W2067278605
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
informed consent, informed consent forms, paper forms, personhood, agency, hospital bureaucracy, research subjects, patients, medical ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Form‐Made Persons: Consent Forms as Consent's Blind Spot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.249
The paper
Jacob, M. (2007). Form‐Made Persons: Consent Forms as Consent's Blind Spot. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review. https://doi.org/10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.249