Chatbodies
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Images generated by AI could promote bias due to their training data, system prompts, or responses to previous scandals.
“The images generated by AI could also promote bias due to their training data, system prompts, or responses to previous scandals (see Robertson, 2024;Yue, 2024).”
From A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research (2026) · cites this paper as Yue, 2024
In “Chatbodies” (page unavailable), Yue says imaging technologies can encode discriminatory attitudes about race and gender, supporting the general concern about bias. The paper also describes a chatbot producing hateful statements after user interactions, but it does not establish that AI-generated images promote bias because of training data, system prompts, or responses to previous scandals. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Harun Farocki, ''Phantom Images,'' Public 29 (2004): 12-22.
- Michel Chion, The Voice in Cinema, trans. Claudia Gorbman (New York, 1999).
- Thao Phan, ''Amazon Echo and the Aesthetic of Whiteness,'' Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5, no. 1 (2019): 1, 4. 9. Ibid., 4.
- Amanda Cercas Curry and Verena Rieser, ''#MeToo: How Conversational Sys- tems Respond to Sexual Harassment,'' in Proceedings of the Second ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguis- tics, January 2018, 7-14.
- Wendy Hui Kyong Chun and Sarah Friedland, ''Habits of Leaking: Of Sluts and Network Cards,'' differences 26, no. 2 (2015): 9.
- Cited in Matthew Handelman, ''Artificial Antisemitism: Critical Theory in the Age of Datafication,'' Critical Inquiry 48, no. 2 (2022): 228, 233. Chatbodies
- See, for instance: Ruha Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (Cambridge, 2019);
- Cathy O'Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (New York, 2016); and Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition (Cambridge, MA, 2021).
- Jessa Lingel and Kate Crawford, '''Alexa, Tell Me About Your Mother': The History of the Secretary and the End of Secrecy,'' Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6, no. 1 (2020): 16.
- Zoe Vorsino, ''Chatbots, Gender, and Race on Web 2.0 Platforms: Tay.AI as Monstrous Femininity and Abject Whiteness,'' Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 47, no. 1 (2021): 114.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research
Smith, S. M., Tate, M., Freeman, K., Walsh, A., Ballsun-Stanton, B., & Lane, M. (2026) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2025.2509187 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yue, G.
- Corresponding author
- Yue, Genevieve
- Venue
- Representations
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 180-201
- ISSN
- 0734-6018 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-855X
- OpenAlex
- W4404316218
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Representations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- chatbots, embodiment, digital body, human-AI interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
