Cited by 9Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionParanormal Experiences and BeliefsReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Science-Fictionalization of Trauma: Remarks on Narratives of Alien Abduction

Luckhurst, Roger·1998·Science Fiction Studies

Abstract

The cultural phenomenon of alien abduction narratives has been met with silence or contempt by most of the academic community. This is an understandable response, given the mix of credulity, pseudo-scientific legitimation and uncontrolled paranoia surrounding the discourse of abduction. This essay argues that however outlandish the claims of UFOlogists and abduction researchers, the phenomenon is worthy of study for its evidence of an increasing “science-fictionalisation” of certain aspects of contemporary American culture. Four vectors are identified as being responsible for the emergence of abduction stories: shifts in conceptions of memory and subjectivity in American psychiatry (particularly claims surrounding “recovered memory” and hypnotic regression); increasing fears around the intrusiveness of a technologically saturated world, and subsequent extension of the discourse of the American technological sub-lime; the emergence of a distinctive counter-cultural New Ageism, which articulates the visitation of UFOs in larger discourses of spiritual evolution; an intensification of post-war American conspiracy theory and suspicions of “big government. ” Ending with a reading of the way in which these elements are synthesized by The X-Files, the essay concludes by suggesting that abduction narratives are the science fictionalised products of a felt intermittency of subjectivity in contemporary America. (RL)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/sfs.25.1.0029

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although each UFO abduction account is unique, there exists a generic narrative.

    “Indeed, although each UFO abduction account is unique, we can also speak of the existence of a “generic narrative” (Luckhurst, 1998, p. 31; see also Bullard, 1989; Smith, 2001).”

    From Race and (the Study of) Esotericism (2020) · cites this paper as Luckhurst, 1998

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Luckhurst, R.
Corresponding author
Luckhurst, Roger
Venue
Science Fiction Studies
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
25
Issue
Part 1
Pages
29-52
ISSN
  • 0091-7729 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-6207
OpenAlex
W4409415453
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science Fiction Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
ufology, recovered memory, hypnotic regression, American psychiatry, technological sublime, spiritual evolution, conspiracy theories, distrust of government, The X-Files, trauma, subjectivity, American culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review