The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Science-Fictionalization of Trauma: Remarks on Narratives of Alien Abduction
Abstract
The cultural phenomenon of alien abduction narratives has been met with silence or contempt by most of the academic community. This is an understandable response, given the mix of credulity, pseudo-scientific legitimation and uncontrolled paranoia surrounding the discourse of abduction. This essay argues that however outlandish the claims of UFOlogists and abduction researchers, the phenomenon is worthy of study for its evidence of an increasing “science-fictionalisation” of certain aspects of contemporary American culture. Four vectors are identified as being responsible for the emergence of abduction stories: shifts in conceptions of memory and subjectivity in American psychiatry (particularly claims surrounding “recovered memory” and hypnotic regression); increasing fears around the intrusiveness of a technologically saturated world, and subsequent extension of the discourse of the American technological sub-lime; the emergence of a distinctive counter-cultural New Ageism, which articulates the visitation of UFOs in larger discourses of spiritual evolution; an intensification of post-war American conspiracy theory and suspicions of “big government. ” Ending with a reading of the way in which these elements are synthesized by The X-Files, the essay concludes by suggesting that abduction narratives are the science fictionalised products of a felt intermittency of subjectivity in contemporary America. (RL)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although each UFO abduction account is unique, there exists a generic narrative.
“Indeed, although each UFO abduction account is unique, we can also speak of the existence of a “generic narrative” (Luckhurst, 1998, p. 31; see also Bullard, 1989; Smith, 2001).”
From Race and (the Study of) Esotericism (2020) · cites this paper as Luckhurst, 1998
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism
Asprem, E., & Strube, J. (2021) · doi:10.1163/9789004446458 · Cited by 63
Race and (the Study of) Esotericism
Bakker, J. (2020) · New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism · doi:10.1163/9789004446458_009 · Cited by 6
Popular Trauma Culture: The Pain of Others Between Holocaust Tropes and Kitsch-Sentimental Melodrama
Rothe, A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29404-9_4 · Cited by 4
13. Der hinkende Wunschtraum – Poetisierungsversuche der Wissenschaften
(2013) · Böhlau Verlag eBooks · doi:10.7788/boehlau.9783412211899.495
Centenary Paper: Novelar falsas memorias, o ‘síndrome de Campuzano’
de León, V. P. (2024) · Bulletin of Hispanic Studies · doi:10.3828/bhs.2024.60
Modern Metamorphoses of Motherhood
Manickam, S. (2025) · Studies in global science fiction · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86282-3_2
Alien Abduction as Enlightenment
Dumsday, T. (2025) · Journal of Religion and Popular Culture · doi:10.1525/jrpc.2025.aa111
Metadata
- Authors
- Luckhurst, R.
- Corresponding author
- Luckhurst, Roger
- ORCID
- Luckhurst, Roger
- Venue
- Science Fiction Studies
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- Part 1
- Pages
- 29-52
- ISSN
- 0091-7729 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-6207
- OpenAlex
- W4409415453
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science Fiction Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Keywords
- ufology, recovered memory, hypnotic regression, American psychiatry, technological sublime, spiritual evolution, conspiracy theories, distrust of government, The X-Files, trauma, subjectivity, American culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review