Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 49

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Role Transitions, Objects, and Identity

Silver, Ira·1996·Symbolic Interaction

Abstract

Most research on role transitions, following a tradition pioneered by van Gennep, regards these major turning points in the life course primarily as times when people move between different sets of social networks. While these studies acknowledge that rites of passage occur within particular physical spaces in which material objects are present, the importance of such objects has received little attention. I explore one particular role transition—moving away to college—and illustrate that objects play a central role in how students construct their identities. Students at “Midwestern” University make strategic choices about which objects to leave at home as anchors of prior identities and which ones to bring to school as markers of new identities. Moreover, I suggest that the meanings of these two categories of objects differ by gender. I argue that this case opens up the possibility that objects play a much more central part in role transitions than social scientists have acknowledged. This study also challenges existing assumptions about different processes of identity formation. Therefore, it engenders the need for additional research about how people reinterpret objects during role transitions, and about the different meanings that objects may have for the constructions of masculinity and femininity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/si.1996.19.1.1

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Adelman Mara, 1992, Diversity in Consumer Research, 401
  2. Aldrich Nelson W., 1988, Old Money: The Myth of America's Upper Class.
  3. Benjamin Walter, 1955, Illuminations, 59
  4. Coles Robert, 1977, Privileged Ones, Vol. 5 of Children of Crisis.
  5. Davis James A., 1958, Cultural Factors in the Perception of Status Symbols, The Midwest Sociologist, 21, 1
  6. Dittmar Helga, 1992, The Social Psychology of Material Possessions.
  7. Furby Lita, 1978, Life Span Development and Behavior, 297
  8. Glaser Barney G., 1971, Status Passage.
  9. Goffman Erving, 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
  10. Goffman Erving, 1961, Asylums.
  11. James William, 1950, Principles of Psychology
  12. Laumann Edward O., 1970, Living Room Styles and Social Attributes: The Patterning of Material Artifacts in a Modern Urban Community, Sociology and Social Research, 54, 321
  13. Levinson Daniel J., 1978, The Seasons of a Man's Life.
  14. McAdams Dan, 1993, The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self.
  15. Mead George Herbert, 1934, Mind, Self, and Society.
  16. Nemy Enid, 1986, Security Blankets Never Really Vanish, New York Times Magazine, 73
  17. Radley Alan, 1990, Collective Remembering: Memory in Society, 46
  18. Schutz Alfred, 1971, Collected Papers: The Problem of Social Reality
  19. Sheehy Gail, 1974, Passages.
  20. Stryker Sheldon, 1980, Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural View.
  21. Gennep Arnold, 1960, [1909]. The Rites of Passage, translated by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee
  22. Young Melissa Martin, 1991, Advances in Consumer Research, 33

Cited by

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Silver, I.
Venue
Symbolic Interaction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-03
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 0195-6086
  • 1533-8665
Cited by
49
References
76
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.