CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45Social and Cultural DynamicsHigher Education Research StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Gender, Social Class, and Exclusion: Collegiate Peer Cultures and Social Reproduction

Stuber, Jenny M., Klugman, Joshua, Daniel, Caitlin·2011·Sociological Perspectives
DOI 10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.431
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article explores gender and class exclusion among college students. The authors use qualitative data to explore how students talk about gender and class exclusion and quantitative data to model patterns of exclusion within the Greek system. The Greek system serves as a site for social reproduction. Students constructed young women as elitist and prone to class exclusion, while typifying young men as unconcerned with such matters. Quantitative analyses complicate these findings. Within the Greek system, women are less exclusive than alleged and men more so. This discontinuity may reflect gender stereotypes and gender differences in the embodiment of social class. The authors argue that these patterns reinforce male privilege through the assertion that they are not engaged in social class exclusion while lacing undue blame on women as agents of class reproduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.431

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fraternities and sororities can be locations of substantial social reproduction, particularly regarding issues of privilege.

    “Fraternities and sororities can be locations of substantial social reproduction, particularly regarding issues of privilege (Stuber, Klugman, & Daniel, 2011).”

    From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Stuber, Klugman, & Daniel, 2011

  • External construction of social reproduction by nonmembers depicts women as more concerned about elitism than men, while some studies demonstrate men within fraternities to be more concerned with preservation of privilege.

    “External construction of social reproduction by nonmembers depicts women as more concerned about elitism than men, while some studies demonstrate men within fraternities to be more concerned with preservation of privilege (Stuber et al., 2011).”

    From The Influence of Fraternity and Sorority Involvement: A Critical Analysis of Research (1996–2013) (2014) · cites this paper as Stuber et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Stuber, J. M., Klugman, J., & Daniel, C.
Affiliations
  • University of North Florida (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Stuber, Jenny M.
ORCID
Klugman, Joshua
Venue
Sociological Perspectives
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-09
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
431-451
ISSN
  • 0731-1214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8673
DOI
10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.431
OpenAlex
W1983465652
Cited by
45
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 19 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Sociological Perspectives (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
gender exclusion, Greek life, fraternities and sororities, social reproduction, university students, peer culture, gender stereotypes, male privilege

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review