Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Processes in Disaster: Family Evacuation

Drabek, Thomas E.·1969·Social Problems

Abstract

Family responses to disaster warnings were studied through an analysis of interviews conducted with a random sample of 278 families who were suddenly evacuated from their homes prior to a major flood in Denver, Colorado, June 16, 1965. Using a symbolic interactionist perspective, analysis of the data revealed a series of interrelated but qualitatively distinct processes through which warning, confirmation, and evacuation occurred. Evacuation behavior followed four general patterns: 1) evacuation by default, 2) evacuation by invitation, 3) evacuation by compromise, and 4) evacuation by decision.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/sp.1969.16.3.03a00070

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Drabek, T. E.
Venue
Social Problems
Published
1969-01
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
336-349
ISSN
  • 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8533
OpenAlex
W2052619127
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Processes in Disaster: Family Evacuation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/sp.1969.16.3.03a00070
The paper
Drabek, T. E. (1969). Social Processes in Disaster: Family Evacuation. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1969.16.3.03a00070

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.