The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment
Abstract
Many of the formal conventions of American television entertainment are supports of a larger hegemonic structure. After proposing the concept of ideological hegemony as a useful approach to questions of ideology and control, I indicate interrelated ways in which television messages are integrated into the dominant system of discourse and the prevailing structures of labor, consumption, and politics, in particular through these formal features of prime-time network programs: (1) format and formula (including the rigidity of program length and the narrative curve of action); (2) genre; (3) setting and character type; (4) topical slant; and (5) the solution imposed on the fictional problem. Within certain definite limits—related both to the core of dominant values and to market tolerances—these formal structures are flexible; for example, some of Norman Lear's comedies have disrupted stereotypical conventions of static character and imposed solution. The hegemonic commercial cultural system routinely incorporates some aspects of alternative ideology and rejects the unassimilable. I trace this process to the self-contradictory nature of the dominant ideology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Selections from the prison notebooks
Gramsci, A. (2020) · The Applied Theatre Reader · doi:10.4324/9780429355363-27 · Cited by 9,750
Braverman, H. (1974) · Monthly Review · doi:10.14452/mr-026-03-1974-07_1 · Cited by 5,505
Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century.
Tomich, D., & Braverman, H. (1976) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2063071 · Cited by 2,985
Birchall, I. H. (1977) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1977.tb03233.x · Cited by 2,637
The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism
Bell, D. (1972) · Journal of Aesthetic Education · doi:10.2307/3331409 · Cited by 1,622
Selections from the Prison Notebooks
(2020) · On Violence · doi:10.1515/9780822390169-020 · Cited by 1,447
The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism.
Rieder, J., Bell, D., Habermas, J., McCarthy, T., & O'Connor, J. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066419 · Cited by 644
The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology
Gouldner, A. W. (1976) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15663-4 · Cited by 507
1 The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2011) · The New Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781595587589-003 · Cited by 453
Consciousness and Action among the Western Working Class
Mann, M. (1973) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-01581-8 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Television: Polysemy and popularity
Fiske, J. (1986) · Critical Studies in Mass Communication · doi:10.1080/15295038609366672 · Cited by 362
FEAR, TV NEWS, AND THE REALITY OF CRIME*
CHIRICOS, T., PADGETT, K., & GERTZ, M. (2000) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00905.x · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Gitlin, T.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1979-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-266
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2000133370
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 54.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/sp.1979.26.3.03a00020
- The paper
- Gitlin, T. (1979). Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1979.26.3.03a00020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.