The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Television: Polysemy and popularity
Abstract
This essay argues that the television audience is composed of a wide variety of groups or subcultures, and that in order to be popular a television program must be polysemic so that different subcultures can find in it different meanings that correspond to their differing social relations. The dominant ideology is structured into the text as into the social system, but the structure of both text and society allows space for resistance and negotiation. A close analysis of two scenes from Hart to Hart demonstrates the textual devices which bear the dominant ideology and those which offer opportunities for resistance to it. To understand the popularity of television with its diverse audiences, the critic must look for contradictions and openness in the television text, not unity and closure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marxism and the philosophy of language
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,967
Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79
(2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203381182 · Cited by 1,728
(1982) · Capital & Class · doi:10.1177/030981688201600108 · Cited by 1,212
Morley, D. (1980) · Cited by 1,181
INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION STUDIES
Fiske, J. (1982) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203323212 · Cited by 1,130
Self-citationThe Role of the Reader. Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts
White, J. J., & Eco, U. (1981) · The Modern Language Review · doi:10.2307/3727019 · Cited by 938
The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts
Champagne, R. A., & Eco, U. (1980) · World Literature Today · doi:10.2307/40135037 · Cited by 595
People's History and Socialist Theory.
Pollard, S., & Samuel, R. (1981) · The Economic History Review · doi:10.2307/2595903 · Cited by 464
People's History and Socialist Theory.
Nolan, M., & Samuel, R. (1981) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2067231 · Cited by 352
Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment
Gitlin, T. (1979) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1979.26.3.03a00020 · Cited by 301
Cited by
Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek's Culture of Consumption : Figure 1
Kozinets, R. V. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/321948 · Cited by 1,051
FEAR, TV NEWS, AND THE REALITY OF CRIME*
CHIRICOS, T., PADGETT, K., & GERTZ, M. (2000) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00905.x · Cited by 302
The New Narrative Research in Education
Casey, K. (1995) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167282 · Cited by 270
Science and the sources of hype
Caulfield, T., & Condit, C. (2012) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000336533 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiske, J.
- Venue
- Critical Studies in Mass Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-408
- ISSN
- 0739-3180 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050889094
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 28.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Television: Polysemy and popularity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15295038609366672
- The paper
- Fiske, J. (1986). Television: Polysemy and popularity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038609366672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.