The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconceptualizing Gender Relations
Abstract
This paper identifies and analyzes three constructs basic to the study of gender relations–boundaries, negotiation and domination, and consciousness. The concept of boundaries describes the complex structures–physical, social, ideological, and psychological–which establish differences and commonalities between women arid men, among women, and among men. The reciprocal processes of negotiation and domination elucidate the ways in which women and men act to support and/or challenge the existing system of gender relations. While domination describes systems of control and coercion, negotiation addresses the ways women and men bargain for privileges and resources. Consciousness assumes various forms ranging from gender awareness to feminist/anti-feminist consciousness, and is conceived as a process which develops dialectically in the social relations of the sexes. We argue that this conceptual framework produces a more sensitive and complex set of analytical tools for understanding gender relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position
Blumer, H. (1958) · The Pacific Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/1388607 · Cited by 3,487
Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination
Taub, N., & MacKinnon, C. A. (1980) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1122289 · Cited by 644
Cited by
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091
The gender gap in mental health service use
Pattyn, E., Verhaeghe, M., & Bracke, P. (2015) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-015-1038-x · Cited by 183
WHEN WIVES ARE MAJOR PROVIDERS: Culture, Gender, and Family Work
BOLAK, H. C. (1997) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124397011004003 · Cited by 102
Richards, J., & Parry, K. D. (2020) · International Review for the Sociology of Sport · doi:10.1177/1012690219835487 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerson, J. M., & Peiss, K.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-331
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2000754657
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.