Working with Co-Ethnics: Earnings Penalties for Latino Immigrants at Latino Jobsites
Abstract
We demonstrate that Mexicans and Central Americans legalized through the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act suffer a substantial pay penalty for working at jobsites where co-ethnics predominate, above and beyond the influences of low levels of human capital, employment in informal or secondary sector jobs, or in less-skilled occupations. Utilizing the 1992 Legalized Population Survey, we regress wages on individual, job, and occupational characteristics. These models demonstrate a sizable, negative effect of employment in a Latino ghetto, which outweighs the effects of many years of education, labor force experience, or job tenure. Most of the respondents work at jobsites saturated with co-ethnics, and such segregation puts them at a pronounced monetary disadvantage. We argue that policies to improve immigrant Latinos' labor market outcomes must move beyond prescriptions for enhancing workers' human capital to address structural factors that contribute to underpayment at Latino jobsites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Educational and occupational networks create barriers to high-level professions for black and Latino workers.
“This constrained upward mobility is reflected in the structure of educational and occupational networks which act as barriers to high-level professions for black and Latino workers (Catanzarite and Aguilera 2002; Cohen and Huffman 2007; Kmec 2003; Royster 2003).”
From Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Catanzarite and Aguilera 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Seltzer, N. (2019) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-019-00790-6 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
“This constrained upward mobility is reflected in the structure of educational and occupational networks, which act as barriers to high-level professions for black and Latino workers (Catanzarite and Aguilera 2002; Cohen and Huffman 2007; Kmec 2003; Royster 2003).”
Minority job concentration and wages
Kmec, J. A. (2003) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2003.50.1.38 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Catanzarite, L., & Aguilera, M. B.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Catanzarite, Lisa
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-127
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2046682885
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Labour Market and Migration
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Keywords
- Latino immigrants, earnings penalty, wage discrimination, ethnic concentration, Mexican immigrants, Central American migrants, labor market outcomes, human capital
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review