The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Why Whites Favor Spending More Money to Fight Crime: The Role of Racial Prejudice
Abstract
A “get-tough” approach has guided criminal justice policy in the United States since the 1970s. This approach has involved hiring more police, building more prisons, and handing out longer and more certain prison terms for a variety of offenses. Although scholars dispute the impact of such measures, they generally agree that these steps stem in part from widespread public concern over crime and the desire that the criminal justice system treat suspects and criminals more punitively. Prior research, however, has found that racial prejudice partly underlies punitive sentiments among the public. This article extends this work into another important dimension of public opinion on crime, the view that the criminal justice system needs more money to fight crime. We investigate a link between racial prejudice and this view using data on white Americans in the 2000 General Social Survey. We find that whites who perceive African Americans as more violent are more likely to want more money spent on crime. In specifying this general result, we find further that this relationship is limited to one segment of whites: the most racially prejudiced. Final remarks address the theoretical and pragmatic implications of these findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For some scholars, the group threat position implies that large or salient minority populations may elicit stereotypes and fears about crime, safety, or immorality”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Barkan & Cohn 2005
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 181
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- Aguirre Adalberto, 1993, Social Justice, 20, 150
- 10.1177/0022427894031002007 · DOI
- 10.1080/07418829800093971 · DOI
- Bauer, Lynn and Steven D. Owens. 2004. Justice Expenditure and Employment in the United States, 2001. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. · DOI
- 10.1086/367921 · DOI
- Beckett, 1999, Katherine and Theodore Sasson
- Bennett William J, 1996, Walters
- Blalock Hubert, Toward a Theory of Minority-group Relations
- 10.2307/1388607 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3053313 · DOI
- Blumstein, 2000, Alfred and Joel Wallman
- 10.2307/2096070 · DOI
- 10.1177/073401689301800106 · DOI
- 10.2307/2998598 · DOI
- 10.1080/07418829200091611 · DOI
- Chambliss William J, Power, Politics, and Crime, 10.4324/9780429498084 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00523.x · DOI
- 10.2307/800534 · DOI
- Collins Randall, Four Sociological Traditions
- Converse Philip, Pp. 206-61 in Ideology and Discontent, edited by David E. Apter.
- Cullen Francis T, 2000, Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 27, 1, 10.1086/652198 · DOI
- 10.1177/001112877902500101 · DOI
- Dorfman, 2001, Lori and Vincent Schiraldi
- Edsall Thomas B, 1992, Edsall
- Entman Robert M, The Black Image in the White Mind
- 10.2307/2110507 · DOI
- Gerth Hans, 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology
- Gilens Martin, Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy
- 10.2307/2669264 · DOI
- 10.1080/07418829300091831 · DOI
- 10.2307/2779552 · DOI
- Harrison Paige M, 2003, Beck
- 10.2307/799694 · DOI
- 10.2307/2111769 · DOI
- Hurwitz Jon, 1998. Perception and Prejudice: Race and Politics in the United States
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.69 · DOI
- Jackson Pamela I, Minority Group Threat, Crime, and Policing
- 10.2307/3088936 · DOI
- 10.2307/3005884 · DOI
- Johnson Devon, 2001, Sociological Focus, 34, 33, 10.1080/00380237.2001.10571182 · DOI
- Kinder Donald R, Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb00391.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2083240 · DOI
- 10.2307/2578391 · DOI
- Mauer Marc, Race to Incarcerate
- Mauer, 2002, Marc and Meda Chesney-Lind
- 10.1086/297790 · DOI
- 10.2307/2647605 · DOI
- Olzak Susan, The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict
- Peffley, 1998, Mark and Jon Hurwitz
- Petinico George, 1994, The Public Perspective: A Roper Center Review of Public Opinion and Polling, 5, 29
- 10.2307/3081150 · DOI
- Reich Michael, Pp. 183-88 in Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective
- 10.2307/2094234 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01169.x · DOI
- Sniderman Paul M, The Scar of Race, 10.4324/9780429501531-4 · DOI
- 10.2307/3449812 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1996.tb00221.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2094250 · DOI
- Taylor Chuck, 1997, Miami Herald, 7, A10
- 10.2307/2657265 · DOI
- 10.2307/3096886 · DOI
- 10.2307/1142462 · DOI
- Thomas Charles W, Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture
- Walker Samuel, The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America
- 10.1525/sp.2004.51.3.305 · DOI
- Wilson James Q, Pp. 489-507 in Crime, edited by James Q. Wilson and Joan Petersilia.
- 10.1521/soco.1990.8.2.161 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- BARKAN, S. E., & COHN, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Maine (US)
- Corresponding author
- BARKAN, STEVEN E.
- ORCID
- BARKAN, STEVEN E.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-314
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2033570307
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 25.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Problems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- racial prejudice, public opinion on crime, punitiveness, White Americans, criminal justice policy, racial stereotypes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review