Upstream ORFs are prevalent translational repressors in vertebrates
Open accessAbstract
Regulation of gene expression is fundamental in establishing cellular diversity and a target of natural selection. Untranslated mRNA regions (UTRs) are key mediators of post-transcriptional regulation. Previous studies have predicted thousands of ORFs in 5'UTRs, the vast majority of which have unknown function. Here, we present a systematic analysis of the translation and function of upstream open reading frames (uORFs) across vertebrates. Using high-resolution ribosome footprinting, we find that (i)uORFs are prevalent within vertebrate transcriptomes, (ii) the majority show signatures of active translation, and (iii)uORFs act as potent regulators of translation and RNA levels, with a similar magnitude to miRNAs. Reporter experiments reveal clear repression of downstream translation by uORFs/oORFs. uORF number, intercistronic distance, overlap with the CDS, and initiation context most strongly influence translation. Evolution has targeted these features to favor uORFs amenable to regulation over constitutively repressive uORFs/oORFs. Finally, we observe that the regulatory potential of uORFs on individual genes is conserved across species. These results provide insight into the regulatory code within mRNA leader sequences and their capacity to modulate translation across vertebrates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sequences with out-of-frame upstream start codons (uAUGs) or upstream open reading frames (uORFs) show decreased ribosome loading.
“Our data clearly show the expected decrease in ribosome loading for sequences with either out-of-frame upstream start codons (uAUGs) (Fig. 1c) or upstream open reading frames (uORFs) (Supplementary Fig. 2b)18,19.”
From Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Ingolia, N. T., Lareau, L. F., & Weissman, J. S. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.002 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., & Marcotte, E. M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1270 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
Codon Optimality Is a Major Determinant of mRNA Stability
Presnyak, V., Alhusaini, N., Chen, Y.-H., Martin, S., Morris, N., Kline, N., Olson, S., Weinberg, D., Baker, K. E., Graveley, B. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.029 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
Ribosome Profiling Provides Evidence that Large Noncoding RNAs Do Not Encode Proteins
Guttman, M., Russell, P., Ingolia, N. T., Weissman, J. S., & Lander, E. S. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.009 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Ribosome Profiling Shows That miR-430 Reduces Translation Before Causing mRNA Decay in Zebrafish
Bazzini, A. A., Lee, M. T., & Giraldez, A. J. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215704 · Cited by 709 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…transcripts, we compared it to the repressive effects of miR-430, a driving factor in zebrafish development shown to translationally repress and deadenylate a significant portion of the transcriptome during the maternal – zygotic transition (Giraldez et al , 2006; Bazzini et al , 2012).”
Self-citationMuckenthaler, M. U., Galy, B., & Hentze, M. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.28.061807.155521 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Widespread disruption of host transcription termination in HSV-1 infection
Rutkowski, A. J., Erhard, F., L’Hernault, A., Bonfert, T., Schilhabel, M., Crump, C., Rosenstiel, P., Efstathiou, S., Zimmer, R., Friedel, C. C., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8126 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Barbosa C, Gene D (2014) Upstream open reading frames and human genetic disease. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester
- Chatterjee S, Berwal SK, Pal JK (2010) Pathological mutations in 5 0 untranslated regions of human genes. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester
- Crappé J, Van Criekinge W, Trooskens G, Hayakawa E, Luyten W, Baggerman G, Menschaert G (2013) Combining in silico prediction and ribosome The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016 ª 2016 The Authors profiling in a genome-wide search for novel putatively coding sORFs. BMC Genom 14: 648
- Huch S, Nissan T (2014) Interrelations between translation and general mRNA degradation in yeast. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5: 747 -763
- Lawless C, Pearson RD, Selley JN, Smirnova JB, Grant CM, Ashe MP, Pavitt GD, Hubbard SJ (2009) Upstream sequence elements direct post- transcriptional regulation of gene expression under stress conditions in yeast. BMC Genom 10: 7
- Loughran G, Sachs MS, Atkins JF, Ivanov IP (2012) Stringency of start codon selection modulates autoregulation of translation initiation factor eIF5. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 2898 -2906 ª 2016 The Authors The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016
- Slavoff SA, Mitchell AJ, Schwaid AG, Cabili MN, Ma J, Levin JZ, Karger AD, Budnik BA, Rinn JL, Saghatelian A (2013) Peptidomic discovery of short open reading frame-encoded peptides in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 9: 59 -64
- Wethmar K (2014) The regulatory potential of upstream open reading frames in eukaryotic gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5: 765 -778
- Wethmar K, Schulz J, Muro EM, Talyan S, Andrade-Navarro MA, Leutz A (2015) Comprehensive translational control of tyrosine kinase expression by upstream open reading frames. Oncogene doi:10.1038/ onc.2015.233 · DOI
- Wolin SL, Walter P (1988) Ribosome pausing and stacking during translation of a eukaryotic mRNA. EMBO J 7: 3559 -3569 The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016 ª 2016 The Authors
- Zhou F, Roy B, von Arnim AG (2010) Translation reinitiation and development are compromised in similar ways by mutations in translation initiation factor eIF3h and the ribosomal protein RPL24. BMC Plant Biol 10: 193 ª 2016 The Authors The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay
Sample, P. J., Wang, B., Reid, D. W., Presnyak, V., McFadyen, I. J., Morris, D. R., & Seelig, G. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0164-5 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Translation affects mRNA stability in a codon-dependent manner in human cells
Wu, Q., Medina, S. G., Kushawah, G., DeVore, M. L., Castellano, L. A., Hand, J. M., Wright, M., & Bazzini, A. A. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.45396 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationMudge, J. M., Jungreis, I., Hunt, T., Gonzalez, J. M., Wright, J. C., Kay, M., Davidson, C., Fitzgerald, S., Seal, R., Tweedie, S., et al. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.246462.118 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“However, it remains unclear what proportion of these are regulatory ORFs that do not produce functional peptides and instead compete with the canonical CDS for ribosome binding, or else are simply stochastic interactions (Calvo et al. 2009; Bazzini et al. 2014; Johnstone et al. 2016).”
Background
- Authors
- Johnstone, T. G., Bazzini, A. A., & Giraldez, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2016-02-19
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 706-723
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC4818764
- OpenAlex
- W2282922301
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Health (T32GM007499, R01GM081602‐07, R01GM103789‐03, R01HD074078‐03)
- Pew Fellows Program in Biomedical Sciences
- Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences
- March of Dimes
- Yale Scholars Program
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
- Keywords
- upstream open reading frames, protein synthesis inhibition, 5' untranslated region, post-transcriptional regulation, ribosome profiling, mRNA leader sequence
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Vertebrates, Open Reading Frames
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review