Cited by 346RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingRNA modifications and cancer

Upstream ORFs are prevalent translational repressors in vertebrates

Open access
Johnstone, Timothy G, Bazzini, Ariel A, Giraldez, Antonio J·2016·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Regulation of gene expression is fundamental in establishing cellular diversity and a target of natural selection. Untranslated mRNA regions (UTRs) are key mediators of post-transcriptional regulation. Previous studies have predicted thousands of ORFs in 5'UTRs, the vast majority of which have unknown function. Here, we present a systematic analysis of the translation and function of upstream open reading frames (uORFs) across vertebrates. Using high-resolution ribosome footprinting, we find that (i)uORFs are prevalent within vertebrate transcriptomes, (ii) the majority show signatures of active translation, and (iii)uORFs act as potent regulators of translation and RNA levels, with a similar magnitude to miRNAs. Reporter experiments reveal clear repression of downstream translation by uORFs/oORFs. uORF number, intercistronic distance, overlap with the CDS, and initiation context most strongly influence translation. Evolution has targeted these features to favor uORFs amenable to regulation over constitutively repressive uORFs/oORFs. Finally, we observe that the regulatory potential of uORFs on individual genes is conserved across species. These results provide insight into the regulatory code within mRNA leader sequences and their capacity to modulate translation across vertebrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embj.201592759

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequences with out-of-frame upstream start codons (uAUGs) or upstream open reading frames (uORFs) show decreased ribosome loading.

    “Our data clearly show the expected decrease in ribosome loading for sequences with either out-of-frame upstream start codons (uAUGs) (Fig. 1c) or upstream open reading frames (uORFs) (Supplementary Fig. 2b)18,19.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barbosa C, Gene D (2014) Upstream open reading frames and human genetic disease. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester
  2. Chatterjee S, Berwal SK, Pal JK (2010) Pathological mutations in 5 0 untranslated regions of human genes. In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester
  3. Crappé J, Van Criekinge W, Trooskens G, Hayakawa E, Luyten W, Baggerman G, Menschaert G (2013) Combining in silico prediction and ribosome The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016 ª 2016 The Authors profiling in a genome-wide search for novel putatively coding sORFs. BMC Genom 14: 648
  4. Huch S, Nissan T (2014) Interrelations between translation and general mRNA degradation in yeast. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5: 747 -763
  5. Lawless C, Pearson RD, Selley JN, Smirnova JB, Grant CM, Ashe MP, Pavitt GD, Hubbard SJ (2009) Upstream sequence elements direct post- transcriptional regulation of gene expression under stress conditions in yeast. BMC Genom 10: 7
  6. Loughran G, Sachs MS, Atkins JF, Ivanov IP (2012) Stringency of start codon selection modulates autoregulation of translation initiation factor eIF5. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 2898 -2906 ª 2016 The Authors The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016
  7. Slavoff SA, Mitchell AJ, Schwaid AG, Cabili MN, Ma J, Levin JZ, Karger AD, Budnik BA, Rinn JL, Saghatelian A (2013) Peptidomic discovery of short open reading frame-encoded peptides in human cells. Nat Chem Biol 9: 59 -64
  8. Wethmar K (2014) The regulatory potential of upstream open reading frames in eukaryotic gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5: 765 -778
  9. Wethmar K, Schulz J, Muro EM, Talyan S, Andrade-Navarro MA, Leutz A (2015) Comprehensive translational control of tyrosine kinase expression by upstream open reading frames. Oncogene doi:10.1038/ onc.2015.233 · DOI
  10. Wolin SL, Walter P (1988) Ribosome pausing and stacking during translation of a eukaryotic mRNA. EMBO J 7: 3559 -3569 The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016 ª 2016 The Authors
  11. Zhou F, Roy B, von Arnim AG (2010) Translation reinitiation and development are compromised in similar ways by mutations in translation initiation factor eIF3h and the ribosomal protein RPL24. BMC Plant Biol 10: 193 ª 2016 The Authors The EMBO Journal Vol 35 | No 7 | 2016

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnstone, T. G., Bazzini, A. A., & Giraldez, A. J.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2016-02-19
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
706-723
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2282922301
Cited by
346
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Health (T32GM007499, R01GM081602‐07, R01GM103789‐03, R01HD074078‐03)
  • Pew Fellows Program in Biomedical Sciences
  • Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences
  • March of Dimes
  • Yale Scholars Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
upstream open reading frames, protein synthesis inhibition, 5' untranslated region, post-transcriptional regulation, ribosome profiling, mRNA leader sequence
MeSH terms
Animals, Repressor Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Vertebrates, Open Reading Frames

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review