Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 684

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phosphorylation of the FUS low‐complexity domain disrupts phase separation, aggregation, and toxicity

Open access
Monahan, Zachary, Ryan, Veronica H, Janke, Abigail M, Burke, Kathleen A, Rhoads, Shannon N, Zerze, Gül H, O'Meally, Robert, Dignon, Gregory L, Conicella, Alexander E, Zheng, Wenwei, Best, Robert B, Cole, Robert N, Mittal, Jeetain, Shewmaker, Frank, Fawzi, Nicolas L·2017·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Neuronal inclusions of aggregated RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) are hallmarks of ALS and frontotemporal dementia subtypes.Intriguingly, FUS's nearly uncharged, aggregation-prone, yeast prion-like, low sequence-complexity domain (LC) is known to be targeted for phosphorylation.Here we map in vitro and in-cell phosphorylation sites across FUS LC.We show that both phosphorylation and phosphomimetic variants reduce its aggregation-prone/prion-like character, disrupting FUS phase separation in the presence of RNA or salt and reducing FUS propensity to aggregate.Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrates the intrinsically disordered structure of FUS LC is preserved after phosphorylation; however, transient domain collapse and self-interaction are reduced by phosphomimetics.Moreover, we show that phosphomimetic FUS reduces aggregation in human and yeast cell models, and can ameliorate FUS-associated cytotoxicity.Hence, post-translational modification may be a mechanism by which cells control physiological assembly and prevent pathological protein aggregation, suggesting a potential treatment pathway amenable to pharmacologic modulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embj.201696394

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Cited by

See all 684

Metadata

Authors
Monahan, Z., Ryan, V. H., Janke, A. M., Burke, K. A., Rhoads, S. N., Zerze, G. H., O'Meally, R., Dignon, G. L., Conicella, A. E., Zheng, W., Best, R. B., Cole, R. N., Mittal, J., Shewmaker, F., & Fawzi, N. L.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2017-08-08
Volume
36
Issue
20
Pages
2951-2967
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2742396220
Cited by
684
References
83
FWCI
35.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorylation of the FUS low‐complexity domain disrupts phase separation, aggregation, and toxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15252/embj.201696394
The paper
Monahan, Z., Ryan, V. H., Janke, A. M., Burke, K. A., Rhoads, S. N., Zerze, G. H., O'Meally, R., Dignon, G. L., Conicella, A. E., Zheng, W., Best, R. B., Cole, R. N., Mittal, J., Shewmaker, F., & Fawzi, N. L. (2017). Phosphorylation of the FUS low‐complexity domain disrupts phase separation, aggregation, and toxicity. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201696394

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.