Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A single‐cell RNA expression atlas of normal, preneoplastic and tumorigenic states in the human breast

Open access
Pal, Bhupinder, Chen, Yunshun, Vaillant, François, Capaldo, Bianca D, Joyce, Rachel, Song, Xiaoyu, Bryant, Vanessa L, Penington, Jocelyn S, Di Stefano, Leon, Tubau Ribera, Nina, Wilcox, Stephen, Mann, Gregory B, kConFab, Papenfuss, Anthony T, Lindeman, Geoffrey J, Smyth, Gordon K, Visvader, Jane E·2021·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

To examine global changes in breast heterogeneity across different states, we determined the single‐cell transcriptomes of > 340,000 cells encompassing normal breast, preneoplastic BRCA1+/– tissue, the major breast cancer subtypes, and pairs of tumors and involved lymph nodes. Elucidation of the normal breast microenvironment revealed striking changes in the stroma of post‐menopausal women. Single‐cell profiling of 34 treatment‐naive primary tumors, including estrogen receptor (ER)+, HER2+, and triple‐negative breast cancers, revealed comparable diversity among cancer cells and a discrete subset of cycling cells. The transcriptomes of preneoplastic BRCA1+/– tissue versus tumors highlighted global changes in the immune microenvironment. Within the tumor immune landscape, proliferative CD8+ T cells characterized triple‐negative and HER2+ cancers but not ER+ tumors, while all subtypes comprised cycling tumor‐associated macrophages, thus invoking potentially different immunotherapy targets. Copy number analysis of paired ER+ tumors and lymph nodes indicated seeding by genetically distinct clones or mass migration of primary tumor cells into axillary lymph nodes. This large‐scale integration of patient samples provides a high‐resolution map of cell diversity in normal and cancerous human breast. To examine global changes in breast heterogeneity across different states, this gene expression resource integrates large‐scale patient samples from diverse tissue states and breast cancer subtypes, offering a refined high‐resolution map of cell diversity in the normal and cancerous human mammary gland. A large‐scale gene expression resource integrates diverse tissue samples and reveals unexpected heterogeneity of breast cancer subtypes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embj.2020107333

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Pal, B., Chen, Y., Vaillant, F., Capaldo, B. D., Joyce, R., Song, X., Bryant, V. L., Penington, J. S., Di Stefano, L., Tubau Ribera, N., Wilcox, S., Mann, G. B., kConFab, Papenfuss, A. T., Lindeman, G. J., Smyth, G. K., & Visvader, J. E.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2021-05-05
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
e107333-e107333
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W3158998710
Cited by
469
References
71
FWCI
20.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A single‐cell RNA expression atlas of normal, preneoplastic and tumorigenic states in the human breast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15252/embj.2020107333
The paper
Pal, B., Chen, Y., Vaillant, F., Capaldo, B. D., Joyce, R., Song, X., Bryant, V. L., Penington, J. S., Di Stefano, L., Tubau Ribera, N., Wilcox, S., Mann, G. B., kConFab, Papenfuss, A. T., Lindeman, G. J., Smyth, G. K., & Visvader, J. E. (2021). A single‐cell RNA expression atlas of normal, preneoplastic and tumorigenic states in the human breast. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020107333

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.