Cited by 27Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

The genetics of domestication: Research into the domestication of livestock and companion animals sheds light both on their “evolution” and human history

Open access
Hunter, Philip·2018·The EMBO Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embr.201745664

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunter, P.
Corresponding author
Hunter, Philip
Venue
The EMBO Reports
Published
2018-01-15
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
201-205
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W2783622533
Cited by
27
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
animal domestication, companion animals, civilization
MeSH terms
Domestication, Animals, Breeding, Civilization, Biological Evolution, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review