Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 292 of the 292 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads

Open access
Cavaillon, Jean‐Marc, Singer, Mervyn, Skirecki, Tomasz·2020·EMBO Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Sepsis has been identified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global health priority. There has been a tremendous effort to decipher underlying mechanisms responsible for organ failure and death, and to develop new treatments. Despite saving thousands of animals over the last three decades in multiple preclinical studies, no new effective drug has emerged that has clearly improved patient outcomes. In the present review, we analyze the reasons for this failure, focusing on the inclusion of inappropriate patients and the use of irrelevant animal models. We advocate against repeating the same mistakes and propose changes to the research paradigm. We discuss the long-term consequences of surviving sepsis and, finally, list some putative approaches-both old and new-that could help save lives and improve survivorship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/emmm.201810128

Cites

292 of 292 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 292 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Balboa E, Saavedra‐Leiva F, Cea LA, Vargas AA, Ramirez V, Escamilla R, Saez JC, Regueira T (2018) Sepsis‐induced channelopathy in skeletal muscles is associated with expression of non‐selective channels. Shock 49: 221–228 · doi:10.1097/shk.0000000000000916
  2. Fleischmann C, Thomas‐Rueddel DO, Hartmann M, Hartog CS, Welte T, Heublein S, Dennler U, Reinhart K (2016) Hospital incidence and mortality rates of sepsis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113: 159–166
  3. Gogos C, Kotsaki A, Pelekanou A, Giannikopoulos G, Vaki I, Maravitsa P, Adamis S, Alexiou Z, Andrianopoulos G, Antonopoulou A et al (2010) Early alterations of the innate and adaptive immune statuses in sepsis according to the type of underlying infection. Crit Care 14: R96 · doi:10.1186/cc9031
  4. Hara N, Chijiiwa M, Yara M, Ishida Y, Ogiwara Y, Inazu M, Kuroda M, Karlsson M, Sjovall F, Elmér E, Uchino H (2015) Metabolomic analyses of brain tissue in sepsis induced by cecal ligation reveal specific redox alterations‐protective effects of the oxygen radical scavenger edaravone. Shock 44: 578–584 · doi:10.1097/shk.0000000000000465
  5. Hassan FI, Didari T, Khan F, Mojtahedzadeh M, Abdollahi M (2018) The role of epigenetic alterations involved in sepsis: an overview. Curr Pharm Des 24: 2862–2869 · doi:10.2174/1381612824666180903114253
  6. Johansen ME, Johansson PI, Ostrowski SR, Bestle MH, Hein L, Jensen AL, Søe‐Jensen P, Andersen MH, Steensen M, Mohr T et al (2015) Profound endothelial damage predicts impending organ failure and death in sepsis. Semin Thromb Hemost 41: 16–25 · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1398377
  7. Kapetanovic R, Parlato M, Fitting C, Quesniaux V, Cavaillon JM, Adib‐Conquy M (2011) Mechanisms of TNF induction by heat‐killed Staphylococcus aureus differ upon the origin of mononuclear phagocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 300: C850–C859 · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00187.2010
  8. Lipton J, Fossler D (1974) Fever produced in the squirrel monkey by intravenous and intracerebral endotoxin. Am J Physiol 226: 1022–1027 · doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.226.5.1022
  9. Reithmair M, Buschmann D, Märte M, Kirchner B, Hagl D, Kaufmann I, Pfob M, Chouker A, Steinlein OK, Pfaffl MW et al (2017) Cellular and extracellular miRNAs are blood‐compartment‐specific diagnostic targets in sepsis. J Cell Mol Med 21: 2403–2411 · doi:10.1111/jcmm.13162
  10. Skirecki T, Mikaszewska‐Sokolewicz M, Hoser G, Zielińska‐Borkowska U (2016) The early expression of HLA‐DR and CD64 myeloid markers is specifically compartmentalized in the blood and lungs of patients with septic shock. Mediators Inflamm 2016: 1–8 · doi:10.1155/2016/3074902
  11. Sriskandan S, Moyes D, Cohen J (1996) Detection of circulating bacterial superantigen and lymphotoxin‐alpha in patients with streptococcal toxic‐shock syndrome. Lancet 348: 1315–1316 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)65800-x
  12. Waterhouse A, Leslie DC, Bolgen DE, Lighbown S, Dimitrakakis N, Cartwright MJ, Seiler B, Lighbown K, Smith K, Lombardo P et al (2018) Modified clinical monitoring assessment criteria for multi‐organ failure during bacteremia and sepsis progression in a pig model. Advan Crit Care Med 1: 002
  13. Wong HR, Sweeney TE, Lindsell CJ (2017b) Simplification of a septic shock endotyping strategy for clinical application. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195: 263–265 · doi:10.1164/rccm.201607-1535le

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Cavaillon, J., Singer, M., & Skirecki, T.
Venue
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Published
2020-03-16
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e10128-e10128
ISSN
  • 1757-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-4684
OpenAlex
W3012116029
Cited by
319
References
292
FWCI
22.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • Polish National Science Center (2013/11/N/NZ6/02581, UMO‐2016/23/D/NZ6/02554)
  • Institut Pasteur

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15252/emmm.201810128
The paper
Cavaillon, J., Singer, M., & Skirecki, T. (2020). Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads. EMBO Molecular Medicine. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201810128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.