The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Objectives: Describe the state of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in 1992 and their evolution by 2015 and where EHRs are expected to be in 25 years. Further to discuss the expectations for EHRs in 1992 and explore which of them were realized and what events accelerated or disrupted/derailed how EHRs evolved. Methods: Literature search based on “Electronic Health Record”, “Medical Record”, and “Medical Chart” using Medline, Google, Wikipedia Medical, and Cochrane Libraries resulted in an initial review of 2,356 abstracts and other information in papers and books. Additional papers and books were identified through the review of references cited in the initial review. Results: By 1992, hardware had become more affordable, powerful, and compact and the use of personal computers, local area networks, and the Internet provided faster and easier access to medical information. EHRs were initially developed and used at academic medical facilities but since most have been replaced by large vendor EHRs. While EHR use has increased and clinicians are being prepared to practice in an EHR-mediated world, technical issues have been overshadowed by procedural, professional, social, political, and especially ethical issues as well as the need for compliance with standards and information security. There have been enormous advancements that have taken place, but many of the early expectations for EHRs have not been realized and current EHRs still do not meet the needs of today’s rapidly changing healthcare environment. Conclusion: The current use of EHRs initiated by new technology would have been hard to foresee. Current and new EHR technology will help to provide international standards for interoperable applications that use health, social, economic, behavioral, and environmental data to communicate, interpret, and act intelligently upon complex healthcare information to foster precision medicine and a learning health system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Savova, G. K., Kipper-Schuler, K. C., Hurdle, J. F., & Meystre, S. M. (2008) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1638592 · Cited by 895
Greenhalgh, T., Hinder, S., Stramer, K., Bratan, T., & Russell, J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c5814 · Cited by 343 · cited 1×
“Recent reports have highlighted the need for efforts to better understand the collection and use of this information in the EHR [97] and there is a lack of consensus on how PHR success will be determined [98, 99].”
An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns
Meeks, D. W., Smith, M. W., Taylor, L., Sittig, D. F., Scott, J. M., & Singh, H. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002578 · Cited by 207 · cited 1×
“Mounting pressure will require EHR implementations to build a robust infrastructure to monitor and learn from adverse events, errors, and potential adverse events and errors [204].”
Exploring the persistence of paper with the electronic health record
Saleem, J. J., Russ, A. L., Justice, C. F., Hagg, H., Ebright, P. R., Woodbridge, P. A., & Doebbeling, B. N. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.001 · Cited by 145
Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems
Koppel, R., & Lehmann, C. U. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003023 · Cited by 140 · cited 1×
“The number of academic institution developed EHRs in use have declined and been replaced by large vendor EHRs since 1992 [57].”
Practical challenges in integrating genomic data into the electronic health record
Kho, A. N., Rasmussen, L. V., Connolly, J. J., Peissig, P. L., Starren, J., Hakonarson, H., & Hayes, M. G. (2013) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2013.131 · Cited by 108
Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices
Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2012) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-15 · Cited by 102
Scaling up a mobile telemedicine solution in Botswana: keys to sustainability
Ndlovu, K., Littman-Quinn, R., Park, E., Dikai, Z., & Kovarik, C. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2014.00275 · Cited by 58
Staes, C. J., Bennett, S. T., Evans, R. S., Narus, S. P., Huff, S. M., & Sorensen, J. B. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1813 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Cited by
Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications
Stoumpos, A. I., Kitsios, F., & Talias, M. A. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20043407 · Cited by 939
Introducing artificial intelligence training in medical education
Paranjape, K., Schinkel, M., Nannan Panday, R., Car, J., & Nanayakkara, P. (2019) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/16048 · Cited by 634
Axes of a revolution: challenges and promises of big data in healthcare
Shilo, S., Rossman, H., & Segal, E. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0727-5 · Cited by 370
Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A., Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020) · Life · doi:10.3390/life10120327 · Cited by 305
“In the early 1990s, a trend in the shift from paper-based health records to electronic records started; this was in response to advances in technology as well as the advocacy of the Institute of Medicine in the United States [1,2].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe emerging role of cognitive computing in healthcare: a systematic literature review
Behera, R. K., Bala, P. K., & Dhir, A. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.024 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, R. S.
- Venue
- Yearbook of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- S 01
- Pages
- S48-S61
- ISSN
- 0943-4747 (ISSN-L)
- 2364-0502
- OpenAlex
- W2406368917
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 33.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15265/iys-2016-s006
- The paper
- Evans, R. S. (2016). Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.15265/iys-2016-s006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.