Cited by 10Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

brief history of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study: RURY R HOLMAN, FOR THE UKPDS GROUP

Open access
Holman, Rury·2022·British Journal of Diabetes

Abstract

The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) epidemiological findings confirmed that T2DM is not a “mild” disease, with roughly 50% of patients having clinically evident complica- tions at diagnosis, emphasising the need for its early detection and treatment. Hyperglycaemia was identified as an independent coronary heart disease risk factor, with progressive hyperglycaemia shown to be a major pathophysiological feature of T2DM, driven by declining beta-cell function. People with T2DM and hypertension were found to be at double jeopardy for any diabetes endpoint, and worsening kidney function was shown to increase the risk of death substantially. The UKPDS 20-year trial results were the first to demon- strate that diabetic complications are not inevitable but can be prevented by more intensive blood glucose control and by metformin therapy, changing T2DM management guide- lines worldwide. The UKPDS also showed that tighter blood pressure control prevents diabetic complications; the benefits of the glucose and blood pressure interventions are additive. The UKPDS 10-year post-trial monitoring study was the first to identify the T2DM glycaemic and metformin legacy effects, with early more intensive therapy having continuing benefits long after the trial terminated. The trial demon- strated the need to achieve good glycaemic control as early as possible to minimise the risk of future complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15277/bjd.2022.359

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holman, R.
Affiliations
Churchill Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Holman, Rury
Venue
British Journal of Diabetes
Published
2022-12-22
Volume
22
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
S32-S35
ISSN
  • 2397-6233 (ISSN-L)
  • 2397-6241
OpenAlex
W4312098516
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • British Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Wellcome Trust
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Diabetes UK
  • Novo Nordisk
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Eye Institute
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
UK Prospective Diabetes Study, type 2 diabetes, diabetes complications, hyperglycemia, coronary heart disease risk, beta-cell function, hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, metformin, glycemic control, blood pressure control, diabetes management guidelines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review