Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.
Abstract
Individual drinking patterns and the perceived typical drinking patterns of close friends and reference groups were assessed in two different studies with college students. In both studies virtually all students reported that their friends drank more than they did. These effects were found across different levels of individual drinking, within different types of samples, across gender of subjects and with different types of questionnaire assessment. In addition, students' estimates of typical or average drinking within their own social living groups were significantly higher than average drinking within the group estimated from self-reports. Because of the consistent, asymmetrical pattern of reports of self and other drinking, it was interpreted that reports of others' drinking were exaggerated. These biases were particularly evident within organized social groups (i.e., fraternities and sororities) but were minimal in reference to "students in general" or "people in general." Results are discussed in terms of cognitive and motivational factors that potentially could promote or excuse excessive drinking practices among college students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals use their perceptions of peer norms as a standard against which to compare their own behaviors.
“individuals use their perceptions of peer norms as a standard against which to compare their own behaviors (e.g., Baer, Stacy, & Larimer, 1991;Clapp & McDonell, 2000;Perkins & Berkowitz, 1986).”
From The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms (2007) · cites this paper as Baer, Stacy, & Larimer, 1991
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 688
- Authors
- Baer, J. S., Stacy, A., & Larimer, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol
- Publisher
- Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 580-586
- ISSN
- 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
- 1934-2683
- OpenAlex
- W2103781836
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01aa005591-05)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (5 RO1AA5591)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
- Keywords
- drinking norms, university students, social comparison, reference groups, fraternities and sororities, alcohol consumption, cognitive biases, excessive drinking
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Social Environment, Social Identification, Social Values, Stereotyping, Students, Washington, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review