Cited by 688Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMedia Influence and HealthHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.

Baer, J S, Stacy, A, Larimer, M·1991·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

Individual drinking patterns and the perceived typical drinking patterns of close friends and reference groups were assessed in two different studies with college students. In both studies virtually all students reported that their friends drank more than they did. These effects were found across different levels of individual drinking, within different types of samples, across gender of subjects and with different types of questionnaire assessment. In addition, students' estimates of typical or average drinking within their own social living groups were significantly higher than average drinking within the group estimated from self-reports. Because of the consistent, asymmetrical pattern of reports of self and other drinking, it was interpreted that reports of others' drinking were exaggerated. These biases were particularly evident within organized social groups (i.e., fraternities and sororities) but were minimal in reference to "students in general" or "people in general." Results are discussed in terms of cognitive and motivational factors that potentially could promote or excuse excessive drinking practices among college students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals use their perceptions of peer norms as a standard against which to compare their own behaviors.

    “individuals use their perceptions of peer norms as a standard against which to compare their own behaviors (e.g., Baer, Stacy, & Larimer, 1991;Clapp & McDonell, 2000;Perkins & Berkowitz, 1986).”

    From The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms (2007) · cites this paper as Baer, Stacy, & Larimer, 1991

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 688

Authors
Baer, J. S., Stacy, A., & Larimer, M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
1991-11
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
580-586
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2103781836
Cited by
688
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 30
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa005591-05)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (5 RO1AA5591)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
drinking norms, university students, social comparison, reference groups, fraternities and sororities, alcohol consumption, cognitive biases, excessive drinking
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Social Environment, Social Identification, Social Values, Stereotyping, Students, Washington, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review