Cited by 132Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and ViolenceCrime Patterns and Interventions

Age of first use: Its reliability and predictive utility

Labouvie, E, Bates, M E, Pandina, R J·1997·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was: (1) to assess the utility of age of first licit use and age of first illicit use as predictors of alcohol and drug use at ages 20 and 30; and (2) to examine the reliability of retrospectively recalled ages of onset of use. METHOD: Subjects (N = 839) from the Rutgers Health and Human Development Project provided four waves of longitudinal data spanning the age range from 15 to 31. RESULTS: Retrospective recall of age of onset revealed a fair degree of relative agreement but a lack of absolute agreement because of an upward shift in recalled ages as individuals became older. Repeated measures ANOVAS revealed normative declines in alcohol and drug use from 20 to 30 even though individual differences in use remained quite stable across time. Regression analyses indicated that: (1) age of first licit use as recalled at age 18 did not predict alcohol or drug use at age 20; (2) age of first illicit use was a weak predictor of alcohol use at 20 but a fairly strong predictor of drug use at 20; and (3) neither age predicted use or use consequences at age 30. CONCLUSIONS: In the general population, illicit drug use and heavier alcohol use are, regardless of age of onset, adolescence-limited phenomena for most individuals. Findings suggest that intervention efforts need to be aimed simultaneously at delaying the onset of illicit use and reducing use levels among young adult users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.638

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies of adolescents have found that estimates of the age of first use do tend to increase upon repeat assessment, but the rank ordering for the different drugs remains the same.

    “Longitudinal studies of adolescents have found that estimates of the age of first use do tend to increase upon repeat assessment (i.e. as people age) ([Engels et al., 1997](#R11); [Henry et al., 1994](#R16); [Labouvie et al., 1997](#R23)), but the rank ordering for the different drugs remains the same ([Engels et al., 1997](#R11); [Henry et al., 1994](#R16); [Labouvie et al., 1997](#R23)).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Labouvie, E., Bates, M. E., & Pandina, R. J.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
1997-11
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
638-643
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2008707093
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01aa005823-07)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA05823)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA003395, DA 03395)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
age of onset, alcohol consumption, illicit drug use, young adult substance use, predictors of substance use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Alcoholism, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychotropic Drugs, Regression Analysis, Illicit Drugs, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Substance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review