Cited by 37Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognition, negative affectivity and substance use in adolescent boys with and without a family history of a substance use disorder.

Shoal, G D, Giancola, P R·2001·Journal of Studies on Alcohol

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test a model of substance use in adolescent males. The model is based on the premise that cognitive distortions and poor constructive thinking represent weaknesses in the ability to adaptively cope with everyday problems. It is postulated that failures in adaptive coping result in increased negative affectivity (e.g., frustration, anger, and anxiety), which fosters substance use as a means of alleviating unpleasant feelings. METHOD: Subjects (N = 276) were 15- to 17-year-old males with a positive (FHP; n = 118) or a negative (FHN; n = 158) family history of a substance use disorder (SUD). Subjects completed self-report measures of constructive thinking, cognitive distortions, negative affectivity, substance use frequency and substance use problems. RESULTS: Negative affectivity mediated the relations between constructive thinking and both substance use variables, in separate analyses, for the FNP and FHN groups. Negative affectivity also moderated the relation between constructive thinking and substance use frequency, such that constructive thinking was negatively related to substance use frequency but only for individuals high in negative affectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Poor constructive thinking skills are related to increased substance use in adolescent males, in part through an association with greater negative affectivity. SUD treatment and prevention efforts may benefit from strategies aimed at improving constructive thinking abilities and reducing negative affectivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.675

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoal, G. D., & Giancola, P. R.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Journal of Studies on Alcohol
Published
2001-07
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
675-686
ISSN
  • 0096-882X (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-2683
OpenAlex
W2037889555
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA-11691, R01AA011691)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P50-DA 05605, T32 DA07304, P50DA005605, T32DA007304)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adolescent substance use, negative affectivity, constructive thinking, cognitive distortions, family history of substance use disorder, adaptive coping, substance use frequency, problematic substance use, mediation, moderation, adolescent boys
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Severity of Illness Index, Mood Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review