Cited by 75Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageDigital and Traditional Archives Management

Preservation of intangible cultural heritage using advance digital technology: Issues and challenges

Open access
Idris, Muhammad Zaffwan, Mustaffa, Norsimaa Binti, Yusoff, Syed Osman Syed·2016·Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education

Abstract

The emerging concern on intangible heritage in the international arena reflects the fear of cultural homogeneity, diminishing cultural diversity and human creativity. Cultural heritage is a symbol spiritual and intellectual wealth of a civilization, while intangible cultural heritage is associated to tradition and living expressions. There is a need to preserve these fragile assets so they would someday be oblivious in the modern world. Ironically, the potential strategy in preserving the intangible cultural heritage lies in the current advanced digital technology. This paper highlights major issues and challenges in the intangible cultural heritage preservation through technology, with regards to the content and the purpose associated to it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15294/harmonia.v16i1.6353

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the interactive and traditional linear version of NEW LIFE communicates ethnography and recreates immaterial elements, so it is associated with intangible cultural heritage, which is particularly difficult to preserve.

    “Both interactive and traditional linear version communicates ethnography and recreates immaterial elements, such as historical events, social values, traditions, ceremonies and living expressions, therefore it is associated with intangible cultural heritage which is particularly difficult to preserve [68,69].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ahmad, A. G. (2006). Cultural heritage of Southeast Asia: preservation for world recognition. Journal of Malay- sian Town Plan, 3(1), 52-62.
  2. Boamah, E., Dorner, D. G. & Oliver, G. (2012). Stakeholders' Attitudes To- wards The Management and Preser- vation Of Digital Cultural Heritage Resources In Ghane. Australian Aca- demic & Research Libraries, 43(4), 300- 317.
  3. Czermak, K., Delanghe, P. & Wei, H. (2003). Preseving intangible cultural heritage in Indonesia. Conference on Language Development, Language Re- vitalization and Multilingual Education in Minority Communities in Asia (pp. 1-8). Bangkok: UNESCO, Jakarta.
  4. Matusky, P. (2015). The Significance of Presevation: To Save or Not To Save? (pp. 56-64). Borneo Research Council Conference: UMS.
  5. Muniapan, B. (2007). Issues And Challeng- es of Management Education In Ma- laysia. Regional conference on quali- ty in higher education quality driven initiatives: sharing good practices in higher education.
  6. Noor, S. M., Lim, K. Y., & Mohamed, R. (2013). Building LenggongWorld Heritage Site Brand Identity: Assess- ing Core Values Of Local Commu- nity. International Conference on Tour- ism Development (pp. 220-231). Pulau Pinang: USM.
  7. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Native, Digital Immigrants. (1-6, Ed.) 9(5).
  8. Rohidi, T. R. (2015). Pengkaryaan Dalam Bidang Seni: Pembuktian Intelek- tual dalam Ramah Akademik. In- ternational Conference Practice Based Research (pp. 1-4). Tanjong Malim: UPSI.
  9. Thurley, S. (2005). The First 21 Years: Into the future. Our stategy for 2005- 2010.In: Conservation Bulletin, English Heritage(49), 26-27. Retrieved from http://content.historicengland.org. uk/images-books/publications/ conservation-bulletin-49/cb4926-27. pdf/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Idris, M. Z., Mustaffa, N. B., & Yusoff, S. O. S.
Affiliations
Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
Venue
Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education
Published
2016-12-26
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
  • 1411-5115 (ISSN-L)
  • 2541-2426
  • 2541-1683
OpenAlex
W2542258497
Cited by
75
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
16.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harmonia Journal of Arts Research and Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Keywords
intangible cultural heritage, cultural heritage preservation, digital technologies, cultural diversity, cultural homogeneity, living tradition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review