Cited by 64Hormonal and reproductive studiesLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Change in grip strength in trans people and its association with lean body mass and bone density

Open access
Scharff, Miranda, Wiepjes, Chantal Maria, Klaver, Maartje, Schreiner, Thomas, T’Sjoen, Guy, den Heijer, Martin·2019·Endocrine Connections

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gender-affirming hormonal treatment (HT) in trans people changes physical appearance. Muscle mass and strength are important aspects of physical appearance, but few data exist on the effect of HT on grip strength and muscle mass. This study aimed to investigate the change in grip strength in trans people during the first year of HT and to study the possible determinants of this change and the associations between changes in grip strength, lean body mass and bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study was performed, including 249 transwomen and 278 transmen. Grip strength, lean body mass and BMD were measured at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS: After 1 year of HT, grip strength decreased with -1.8 kg (95% CI -2.6; -1.0) in transwomen and increased with +6.1 kg (95% CI +5.5; +6.7) in transmen. No differences in grip strength change was found between age groups, BMI groups, hormonal administration routes or hormone concentrations. In transmen, increase in grip strength was associated with increase in lean body mass (per kg increase in grip strength: +0.010 kg, 95% CI +0.003; +0.017), while this was not found in transwomen (per kg increase in grip strength: +0.004 kg, 95% CI -0.000; +0.009). Change in grip strength was not associated with change in BMD in transwomen and transmen. CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year of HT, grip strength decreased in transwomen, and increased in transmen. In transmen only, change in grip strength was associated with change in lean body mass.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/ec-19-0196

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aside from the three prospective studies, data were extracted from medical charts (nine of which were from the same research group), posing a risk of selective data reporting and publication bias.

    “Aside from these three studies, data were extracted from medical charts (nine of which were from the same research group,15 17 19 36–41) posing a risk of selective data reporting and publication bias.”

    From How does hormone transition in transgender women change body composition, muscle strength and haemoglobin? Systematic review with a focus on the implications for sport participation (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Materials and methods section (Study design and study population; page not provided) identifies this paper as part of a multicenter prospective cohort, with measurements taken at baseline and follow-up. That contradicts its apparent inclusion among studies whose data were extracted from medical charts. The paper does not establish the citing sentence’s count of nine studies or its publication-bias assessment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three large ENIGI studies published in 2018 and 2019 contained much novel data, but also included many participants from previous studies, making it impossible to accurately state the number of unique participants.

    “Three large studies from the ENIGI group published in 2018 and 201915 17 19 contained much novel data, but also included many participants from previous studies making it impossible to accurately state the number of unique participants.”

    From How does hormone transition in transgender women change body composition, muscle strength and haemoglobin? Systematic review with a focus on the implications for sport participation (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Study design and study population section (page not available) identifies this as an ENIGI cohort study and reports 527 participants in its analyses. It does not establish how many participants appeared in earlier studies or say that the number of unique participants across the cited studies cannot be determined. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The large ENIGI study was the only study in which the limits of agreement would indicate a change in strength at the 95% CI.

    “The large ENIGI study17 was the only study in which the limits of agreement would indicate a change in strength at the 95% CI.”

    From How does hormone transition in transgender women change body composition, muscle strength and haemoglobin? Systematic review with a focus on the implications for sport participation (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Study design section identifies this as an ENIGI study, and the Results > Grip strength section reports changes in both groups with 95% confidence intervals excluding zero. The paper does not report limits of agreement or compare its findings with other studies to establish that it was the only one meeting the claimed criterion; its reported 95% CIs are not limits of agreement. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite modest reduction in strength, transgender women retained a 17% grip strength advantage over transgender men measured at baseline.

    “Despite this modest reduction in strength, transgender women retained a 17% grip strength advantage over transgender men measured at baseline.”

    From Transgender Women in the Female Category of Sport: Perspectives on Testosterone Suppression and Performance Advantage (2021) · cites this paper as [70]

    Table 1 (Results > Characteristics; page unavailable) reports grip strength of 40.0 kg for transgender women after treatment and 33.1 kg for transgender men at baseline, supporting the comparison despite the women's modest decline. The gap is 17% of the women's 40.0 kg value, but approximately 21% of the men's baseline value; the stated 17% advantage over baseline transgender men therefore depends on an unstated denominator. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Handgrip strength in transgender women was approximately the 25th percentile for males but over the 90th percentile for females, both before and after hormone treatment.

    “handgrip strength in transgender women was in approximately the 25th percentile for males but was over the 90th percentile for females, both before and after hormone treatment.”

    From Transgender Women in the Female Category of Sport: Perspectives on Testosterone Suppression and Performance Advantage (2021) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Discussion reports that, after 12 months of hormone treatment, transwomen’s median grip strength was at the 95th percentile for age-matched females. But it assigns the 25th percentile for age-matched males to transmen, not transwomen, and does not give both percentile comparisons for transwomen before treatment. The Results report that transwomen’s grip strength decreased during treatment, but do not establish the claimed pretreatment percentiles. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scharff, M., Wiepjes, C. M., Klaver, M., Schreiner, T., T’Sjoen, G., & den Heijer, M.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • 3Department of Endocrinology & Center for Sexology and Gender, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • 1Department of Endocrinology and Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Venue
Endocrine Connections
Published
2019-07
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
1020-1028
ISSN
2049-3614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2953424733
Cited by
64
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Connections (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
grip strength, transgender people, gender-affirming hormone therapy, lean body mass, bone mineral density, muscle strength, transgender women, transgender men, sex hormones, physical appearance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review