Cited by 26Adrenal Hormones and DisordersHormonal and reproductive studiesHormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Long-term DHEA substitution in female adrenocortical failure, body composition, muscle function, and bone metabolism: a randomized trial

Christiansen, Jens J, Bruun, Jens M, Christiansen, Jens S, Jørgensen, Jens Otto, Gravholt, Claus H·2011·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Context Adrenal derived androgens are low in women with adrenal failure. The physiological consequences of substitution therapy are uncertain. Objective To investigate the effects of DHEA substitution in women with adrenal failure on body composition, fuel metabolism, and inflammatory markers. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: In this study, ten female patients (median age 38.5 years, range 28-52) with adrenal failure were treated with DHEA 50 mg for 6 months in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, and crossover study. The participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, computed tomography scan of abdominal fat, indirect calorimetry, bicycle ergometry, muscle and fat biopsies, and blood samples. Results Baseline androgens were normalized to fertile range during active treatment. Anthropometric data were unaffected, but lean body mass (LBM) slightly increased compared with placebo (delta LBM (kg) placebo versus DHEA: -0.48±6.1 vs 1.6±3.4, P=0.02) with no alterations in total or abdominal fat mass. PTH increased with DHEA, but no significant changes were observed in other bone markers or in bone mineral content. The mRNA levels of markers of tissue inflammation (adiponectin, interleukin 6 (IL6), IL10, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, and tumor necrosis factor α) in fat and muscle tissue were unaffected by DHEA treatment, as was indirect calorimetry and maximal oxygen uptake. A high proportion of self-reported seborrheic side effects were r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-11-0289

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christiansen, J. J., Bruun, J. M., Christiansen, J. S., Jørgensen, J. O., & Gravholt, C. H.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2011-08
Volume
165
Issue
2
Pages
293-300
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2164848873
Cited by
26
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Keywords
adrenal insufficiency, female patients, androgen replacement, body composition, lean body mass, fat mass, bone metabolism, bone mineral content, parathyroid hormone, fuel metabolism, VO2max, inflammatory markers, adipose tissue inflammation, skeletal muscle inflammation
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adrenal Insufficiency, Adult, Body Composition, Bone and Bones, Dehydroepiandrosterone, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Placebos, Time Factors, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review