Risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the 2013 WHO criteria
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Since many European countries use risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we aimed to determine the performance of selective screening for GDM based on the 2013 WHO criteria. Design and methods: Overall, 1811 women received universal screening with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with GDM in 12.5% (n = 231) women based on the 2013 WHO criteria. We retrospectively applied different European selective screening guidelines to this cohort and evaluated the performance of different clinical risk factors to screen for GDM. Results: By retrospectively applying the English, Irish, French and Dutch guidelines for selective screening, respectively 28.5% (n = 526), 49.7% (n = 916), 48.5% (n = 894) and 50.7% (n = 935) had at least one risk factor, with GDM prevalence of respectively 6.5% (n = 120), 7.9% (n = 146), 8.0% (n = 147) and 8.4% (n = 154). Using maternal age ≥30 and/or BMI ≥25 for screening, positive rate was 69.9% (n = 1288), GDM prevalence 10.2% (n = 188), sensitivity 81.4% (CI: 75.8–86.2%) and specificity 31.8% (CI: 29.5–34.1%). Adding other clinical risk factors did not improve detection. GDM women without risk factors had more neonatal hypoglycemia (14.4 vs 4.0%, P = 0.001) and labor inductions (39.7 vs 25.9%, P = 0.020) than normal-glucose tolerant women, and less cesarean sections than GDM women with risk factors (13.8 vs 31.0%, P = 0.010). Conclusions: By applying selective screening by European guidelines, about 50% of women would need an OGTT with the lowest number of missed cases (33%) by the Dutch guidelines. Screening with age ≥30 years and/or BMI ≥25, reduced the number of missed cases to 18.6% but 70% would need an OGTT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Belgium, GDM prevalence using different criteria was 12.5% for IADPSG, 6.5% for NICE 2015, 7.9% for Irish 2010, 8.0% for French 2010, and 8.9% for Dutch 2010.
“The results presented 12.5%, 6.5%, 7.9%, 8.0%, and 8.9% GDM incidence, respectively [144].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
Cites
Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes
Crowther, C. A., Hiller, J. E., Moss, J. R., McPhee, A. J., Jeffries, W. S., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042973 · Cited by 3,159 · see citing works
A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes
Landon, M. B., Spong, C. Y., Thom, E., Carpenter, M. W., Ramin, S. M., Casey, B., Wapner, R. J., Varner, M. W., Rouse, D. J., Thorp, J. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0902430 · Cited by 2,122 · see citing works
(2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.012 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Song, C., Lyu, Y., Li, C., Liu, P., Li, J., Ma, R. C., & Yang, X. (2018) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12645 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Benhalima, K., Mathieu, C., Van Assche, A., Damm, P., Devlieger, R., Mahmood, T., & Dunne, F. (2016) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.003 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationGlucose Intolerance after a Recent History of Gestational Diabetes Based on the 2013 WHO Criteria
Benhalima, K., Jegers, K., Devlieger, R., Verhaeghe, J., & Mathieu, C. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157272 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
van Montfort, P., Scheepers, H. C. J., van Dooren, I. M. A., Meertens, L. J. E., Wynants, L., Zelis, M., Zwaan, I. M., Spaanderman, M. E. A., & Smits, L. J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.13517 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benhalima, K., Van Crombrugge, P., Moyson, C., Verhaeghe, J., Vandeginste, S., Verlaenen, H., Vercammen, C., Maes, T., Dufraimont, E., De Block, C., Jacquemyn, Y., Mekahli, F., De Clippel, K., Van Den Bruel, A., Loccufier, A., Laenen, A., Minschart, C., Devlieger, R., & Mathieu, C.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- 2Department of Endocrinology, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst-Asse-Ninove, Aalst, Belgium
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE)
- Imelda Hospital (BE)
- 7Department of Endocrinology-Diabetology-Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
- 9Department of Endocrinology, Kliniek St-Jan Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- 10Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kliniek St-Jan Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- 11Department of Endocrinology, AZ St Jan Brugge, Brugge, Belgium
- AZ Sint-Jan (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Benhalima, Katrien
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 353-363
- ISSN
- 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-683X
- OpenAlex
- W2936824931
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Vlaamse regering
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, targeted screening, risk factor screening, oral glucose tolerance test, maternal age, body mass index, screening sensitivity and specificity, neonatal hypoglycemia, labor induction, cesarean section, missed cases, GDM prevalence, pregnancy outcomes, cost-effectiveness, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Europe, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, World Health Organization, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review