Cited by 60Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the 2013 WHO criteria

Open access
Benhalima, Katrien, Van Crombrugge, Paul, Moyson, Carolien, Verhaeghe, Johan, Vandeginste, Sofie, Verlaenen, Hilde, Vercammen, Chris, Maes, Toon +11 more·2019·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: Since many European countries use risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we aimed to determine the performance of selective screening for GDM based on the 2013 WHO criteria. Design and methods: Overall, 1811 women received universal screening with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with GDM in 12.5% (n = 231) women based on the 2013 WHO criteria. We retrospectively applied different European selective screening guidelines to this cohort and evaluated the performance of different clinical risk factors to screen for GDM. Results: By retrospectively applying the English, Irish, French and Dutch guidelines for selective screening, respectively 28.5% (n = 526), 49.7% (n = 916), 48.5% (n = 894) and 50.7% (n = 935) had at least one risk factor, with GDM prevalence of respectively 6.5% (n = 120), 7.9% (n = 146), 8.0% (n = 147) and 8.4% (n = 154). Using maternal age ≥30 and/or BMI ≥25 for screening, positive rate was 69.9% (n = 1288), GDM prevalence 10.2% (n = 188), sensitivity 81.4% (CI: 75.8–86.2%) and specificity 31.8% (CI: 29.5–34.1%). Adding other clinical risk factors did not improve detection. GDM women without risk factors had more neonatal hypoglycemia (14.4 vs 4.0%, P = 0.001) and labor inductions (39.7 vs 25.9%, P = 0.020) than normal-glucose tolerant women, and less cesarean sections than GDM women with risk factors (13.8 vs 31.0%, P = 0.010). Conclusions: By applying selective screening by European guidelines, about 50% of women would need an OGTT with the lowest number of missed cases (33%) by the Dutch guidelines. Screening with age ≥30 years and/or BMI ≥25, reduced the number of missed cases to 18.6% but 70% would need an OGTT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-19-0117

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Belgium, GDM prevalence using different criteria was 12.5% for IADPSG, 6.5% for NICE 2015, 7.9% for Irish 2010, 8.0% for French 2010, and 8.9% for Dutch 2010.

    “The results presented 12.5%, 6.5%, 7.9%, 8.0%, and 8.9% GDM incidence, respectively [144].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benhalima, K., Van Crombrugge, P., Moyson, C., Verhaeghe, J., Vandeginste, S., Verlaenen, H., Vercammen, C., Maes, T., Dufraimont, E., De Block, C., Jacquemyn, Y., Mekahli, F., De Clippel, K., Van Den Bruel, A., Loccufier, A., Laenen, A., Minschart, C., Devlieger, R., & Mathieu, C.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • 2Department of Endocrinology, OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst-Asse-Ninove, Aalst, Belgium
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE)
  • Imelda Hospital (BE)
  • 7Department of Endocrinology-Diabetology-Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
  • Antwerp University Hospital (BE)
  • 9Department of Endocrinology, Kliniek St-Jan Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
  • 10Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kliniek St-Jan Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
  • 11Department of Endocrinology, AZ St Jan Brugge, Brugge, Belgium
  • AZ Sint-Jan (BE)
Corresponding author
Benhalima, Katrien
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2019-06
Volume
180
Issue
6
Pages
353-363
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2936824931
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, targeted screening, risk factor screening, oral glucose tolerance test, maternal age, body mass index, screening sensitivity and specificity, neonatal hypoglycemia, labor induction, cesarean section, missed cases, GDM prevalence, pregnancy outcomes, cost-effectiveness, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Europe, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Maternal Age, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, World Health Organization, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review