Cited by 24Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors

Cognitive outcome in congenital central hypothyroidism: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual patient data

Open access
Naafs, J C, Vendrig, L M, Limpens, J, van der Lee, H J, Duijnhoven, R G, Marchal, J P, Trotsenburg, A S van, Zwaveling-Soonawala, N·2020·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

Objective: To provide an overview of cognitive and motor outcome, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with congenital central hypothyroidism (CH-C). Design: Systematic review with individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Methods: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycInfo were searched from inception to June 11th, 2019. Studies in patients with CH-C, either isolated or with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD), were included if CH-C patients could be separated from any additional patient groups. Primary outcomes were full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) and motor outcome; secondary outcome was QoL. Following data-extraction, one-stage IPD meta-analysis was performed, fitting a linear mixed model with FSIQ as dependent variable. Random intercepts were fitted for each study. Results: Six studies measuring FSIQ were eligible for meta-analysis, comprising 30 CH-C patients (20 males; 27 MPHD patients). FSIQ range was wide (64–123). Mean weighted FSIQ was 97 (95% CI: 88–105). Twenty-seven percent had an FSIQ below 85 (≥1 s.d. below norm score), and 10% below 70 (≥2 s.d. below norm score). There was no significant association between FSIQ and sex or age. Age at treatment initiation was available from three studies only, thus impeding a reliable analysis of this parameter. Motor outcome and QoL were each studied in one study; no quantitative analyses could be performed for these outcomes. Conclusion: A wide range in FSIQ scores was observed in CH-C patients. Results should be interpreted with caution, because included patients mainly had MPHD and age at treatment initiation was unknown for the majority of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje-19-0874

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In those studies, full-scale intelligence quotients were shifted towards lower values, with 10% of patients having an FSIQ below 70.

    “FSIQs were shifted towards lower values with 10% of patients having an FSIQ <70 (below –2 SD in the general population)”
  • The systematic review identified 6 studies measuring full-scale intelligence quotient, including 30 patients in total (27/30 with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies).

    “We identified 6 studies that measured full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ), including 30 patients in total (27/30 MPHD).”
  • So far, FSIQ has only been reported in a few patients with isolated central congenital hypothyroidism; in the authors' previous systematic review, patients with isolated central congenital hypothyroidism were underrepresented.

    “So far, FSIQ has only been reported in a few patients with isolated central CH; in our previous systematic review patients with isolated central CH were underrepresented, highlighting the need for further studies on cognitive outcome in this condition (14, 28).”
  • The included studies were small, heterogeneous, and possibly suffered from selection bias, so results should be interpreted with caution.

    “but the included studies were small, heterogeneous, and possibly suffered from selection bias, so that results should be interpreted with caution (14).”

    From Cognitive and Motor Outcome in Patients with Early-Detected Central Congenital Hypothyroidism Compared with Siblings (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The indexed Abstract passage is a publication record, not a discussion of the included studies. Searches for small studies, heterogeneity, selection bias, and limitations found no passage addressing those points, so the claimed caution cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a recent systematic review, sufficiently large studies on cognitive outcome in patients with central congenital hypothyroidism are lacking.

    “In a recent systematic review, we showed that sufficiently large studies on cognitive outcome in patients with central CH are lacking (14).”

    From Cognitive and Motor Outcome in Patients with Early-Detected Central Congenital Hypothyroidism Compared with Siblings (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The passages available from our copy identify the paper as a systematic review of cognitive outcome in congenital central hypothyroidism, but contain no findings about the size of existing studies. Searches for the claimed lack of sufficiently large studies and for small sample sizes found no passage addressing that conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naafs, J. C., Vendrig, L. M., Limpens, J., van der Lee, H. J., Duijnhoven, R. G., Marchal, J. P., Trotsenburg, A. S. V., & Zwaveling-Soonawala, N.
Affiliations
  • Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • 3Pediatric Clinical Research Office, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 1Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2020-03
Volume
182
Issue
3
Pages
351-361
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W3000943509
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Keywords
multiple pituitary hormone deficiency, intelligence quotient, cognitive outcomes, motor outcome, quality of life, age at treatment initiation, intellectual disability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Congenital Hypothyroidism, Female, Humans, Hypopituitarism, Intelligence Tests, Male, Quality of Life, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review