Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a European perspective

Schlumberger, M, Berg, G, Cohen, O, Duntas, L, Jamar, F, Jarzab, B, Limbert, E, Lind, P, Pacini, F, Reiners, C, Sanchez Franco, F, Toft, A, Wiersinga, WM·2004·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because differentiated (follicular and papillary) thyroid cancer (DTC) may recur years after initial treatment, the follow-up of patients with DTC is long term. However, this population has changed, with more individuals being discovered at an earlier stage of the disease, so that previous follow-up protocols based mostly on data from high-risk patients no longer apply. We sought to develop an improved protocol for the follow-up of low-risk patients with DTC based on the findings of recent studies. METHODS: We analysed recent literature on the follow-up of DTC. RESULTS: Recent large studies have produced three important findings: (i) in patients with low-risk DTC with no evidence of disease up to the 6- to 12-month follow-up, diagnostic whole-body scan adds no information when serum thyroglobulin (Tg) is undetectable and interference from anti-Tg antibodies is absent; (ii) use of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to aid Tg measurement is effective and provides greater safety, quality-of-life and work productivity than does levothyroxine withdrawal with its attendant hypothyroidism; and (iii) ultrasonography performed by an experienced operator is the most sensitive means of detecting neck recurrences of DTC. CONCLUSIONS: We present a revised follow-up protocol for low-risk patients taking into account the above findings. This protocol should help clinicians enter a new era of monitoring characterized by greater safety, simplicity, convenience and cost savings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje.0.1500105

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Schlumberger, M., Berg, G., Cohen, O., Duntas, L., Jamar, F., Jarzab, B., Limbert, E., Lind, P., Pacini, F., Reiners, C., Sanchez Franco, F., Toft, A., & Wiersinga, W.
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
150
Issue
2
Pages
105-112
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2142563702
Cited by
327
References
1
FWCI
25.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a European perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1530/eje.0.1500105
The paper
Schlumberger, M., Berg, G., Cohen, O., Duntas, L., Jamar, F., Jarzab, B., Limbert, E., Lind, P., Pacini, F., Reiners, C., Sanchez Franco, F., Toft, A., & Wiersinga, W. (2004). Follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a European perspective. European Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1500105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.